149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20156377)
1. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists.
Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups.
Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimation: clinical correlations.
Matthews GJ; Motta J; Fracehia JA
J Clin Ultrasound; 1996; 24(9):501-5. PubMed ID: 8906481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Tewari A; Indudhara R; Shinohara K; Schalow E; Woods M; Lee R; Anderson C; Narayan P
J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 May; 24(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8727414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Clarius, Handheld Wireless Point-of-Care Ultrasound, in Evaluating Prostate Morphology and Volume Compared to Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight: Is There a Difference between Transabdominal
Moussaoui G; Zakaria AS; Negrean C; Nguyen DD; Couture F; Tholomier C; Sadri I; Arezki A; Schwartz RN; Elterman DS; Misrai V; Bhojani N; Herrmann TRW; Zorn KC
J Endourol; 2021 Sep; 35(9):1300-1306. PubMed ID: 33677990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Body mass index, prostate weight and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume accuracy.
Sajadi KP; Terris MK; Hamilton RJ; Cullen J; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):990-5. PubMed ID: 17632170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate volume measurement by TRUS using heights obtained by transaxial and midsagittal scanning: comparison with specimen volume following radical prostatectomy.
Park SB; Kim JK; Choi SH; Noh HN; Ji EK; Cho KS
Korean J Radiol; 2000; 1(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11752939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of prostate weight estimation by digital rectal examination versus transrectal ultrasonography.
Loeb S; Han M; Roehl KA; Antenor JA; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 15592029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate weight is the preferred measure of prostate size in radical prostatectomy cohorts.
Hong MK; Yao HH; Rzetelski-West K; Namdarian B; Pedersen J; Peters JS; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109 Suppl 3():57-63. PubMed ID: 22458496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CE-TRUS) with cadence-contrast pulse sequence (CPS) technology for the identification of prostate cancer.
Seitz M; Gratzke C; Schlenker B; Buchner A; Karl A; Roosen A; Singer BB; Bastian PJ; Ergün S; Stief CG; Reich O; Tilki D
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19523857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography.
Rahmouni A; Yang A; Tempany CM; Frenkel T; Epstein J; Walsh P; Leichner PK; Ricci C; Zerhouni E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 1385499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of prostate gland size on the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does size matter initially?
Martínez CH; Chalasani V; Lim D; Nott L; Al-Bareeq RJ; Wignall GR; Stitt L; Pautler SE
J Endourol; 2010 Feb; 24(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 20073551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of transrectal ultrasound scan of the prostate with sector biopsies for 323 New Zealand men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
Smart R
N Z Med J; 1999 Dec; 112(1101):465-9. PubMed ID: 10678211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Myschetzky PS; Suburu RE; Kelly BS; Wilson ML; Chen SC; Lee F
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1991; 137():107-11. PubMed ID: 1947827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F
Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound.
Terris MK; Stamey TA
J Urol; 1991 May; 145(5):984-7. PubMed ID: 2016815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size.
Rodriguez E; Skarecky D; Narula N; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
