These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20156619)

  • 1. Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object.
    Jax SA; Buxbaum LJ
    Cognition; 2010 May; 115(2):350-5. PubMed ID: 20156619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Context and hand posture modulate the neural dynamics of tool-object perception.
    Natraj N; Poole V; Mizelle JC; Flumini A; Borghi AM; Wheaton LA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):506-19. PubMed ID: 23261936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual and motor-based responses to hand actions on objects: evidence from ERPs.
    Kumar S; Yoon EY; Humphreys GW
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 220(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 22644235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conflict between gesture representations extinguishes μ rhythm desynchronization during manipulable object perception: An EEG study.
    Wamain Y; Sahaï A; Decroix J; Coello Y; Kalénine S
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132():202-211. PubMed ID: 29292234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.
    Ansuini C; Giosa L; Turella L; Altoè G; Castiello U
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 185(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 17909766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Viewing objects and planning actions: on the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects.
    Makris S; Hadar AA; Yarrow K
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 21903319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Press to grasp: how action dynamics shape object categorization.
    Triberti S; Repetto C; Costantini M; Riva G; Sinigaglia C
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):799-806. PubMed ID: 26645308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the embodied account of object naming: a concurrent motor task affects naming artifacts and animals.
    Matheson HE; White N; McMullen PA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():33-43. PubMed ID: 24291119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On-line control of grasping actions: object-specific motor facilitation requires sustained visual input.
    Prabhu G; Lemon R; Haggard P
    J Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 27(46):12651-4. PubMed ID: 18003844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of grasp compatibility on long-term memory for objects.
    Canits I; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():65-74. PubMed ID: 29154034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An object-centred reference frame for control of grasping: effects of grasping a distractor object on visuomotor control.
    Patchay S; Haggard P; Castiello U
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(4):532-42. PubMed ID: 16307260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.
    Buxbaum LJ; Sirigu A; Schwartz MF; Klatzky R
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):1091-113. PubMed ID: 12667544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conflict in object affordance revealed by grip force.
    McBride J; Sumner P; Husain M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 21824035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing planning of a familiar grasp to an object: what it is to pick a cup.
    Rounis E; Zhang Z; Pizzamiglio G; Duta M; Humphreys G
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1281-1296. PubMed ID: 28204861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation?
    Gentilucci M; Roy AC; Stefanini S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 15007584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential actions: effects of upcoming perceptual and motor tasks on current actions.
    LeBlanc KA; Westwood DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):955-62. PubMed ID: 26680770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Change detection for real-world objects in perihand space.
    Agauas SJ; Thomas LE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2365-2383. PubMed ID: 31407273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simon in action: the effect of spatial congruency on grasping trajectories.
    Freud E; Aisenberg D; Salzer Y; Henik A; Ganel T
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jan; 79(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 24346423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conflict between object structural and functional affordances in peripersonal space.
    Kalénine S; Wamain Y; Decroix J; Coello Y
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():1-7. PubMed ID: 27327864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response interference between functional and structural object-related actions is increased in patients with ideomotor apraxia.
    Jax SA; Buxbaum LJ
    J Neuropsychol; 2013 Mar; 7(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 22515637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.