173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20156656)
1. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: comparison between retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal approach.
Abuanz S; Gamé X; Roche JB; Guillotreau J; Mouzin M; Sallusto F; Chaabane W; Malavaud B; Rischmann P
Urology; 2010 Oct; 76(4):877-81. PubMed ID: 20156656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective randomised comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches for robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in a single surgeon, single centre study.
Khoder WY; Waidelich R; Ghamdi AMA; Schulz T; Becker A; Stief CG
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):131-137. PubMed ID: 28534190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One trocar assisted pyeloplasty (OTAP): initial experience and codification of a technique.
Lima M; Tursini S; Ruggeri G; Gargano T; Libri M; Domini M
Pediatr Med Chir; 2007; 29(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 17461099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status.
Inagaki T; Rha KH; Ong AM; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
BJU Int; 2005 Mar; 95 Suppl 2():102-5. PubMed ID: 15720343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (report of 150 cases).
Chuanyu S; Guowei X; Ke X; Qiang D; Yuanfang Z
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19660798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: using reconstructive methods based on intraoperative findings.
Kawa G; Tatsumi M; Hiura Y; Muguruma K; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1171-4. PubMed ID: 16984547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience.
Caione P; Lais A; Nappo SG
J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2109-15. PubMed ID: 20851429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty without symphysiotomy for hydronephrosis with horseshoe kidney.
Nishi M; Iwamura M; Kurosaka S; Fujita T; Matsumoto K; Yoshida K
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2013 Aug; 6(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 23710906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retroperitoneoscopic vs open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Valla JS; Breaud J; Griffin SJ; Sautot-Vial N; Beretta F; Guana R; Gelas T; Carpentier X; Leculee R; Steyaert H
J Pediatr Urol; 2009 Oct; 5(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 19369118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve.
Zhu H; Shen C; Li X; Xiao X; Chen X; Zhang Q; Wang H; He Z; Zhou L
Urol Int; 2013; 90(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 23171701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: Randomized clinical trial.
Badawy H; Zoaier A; Ghoneim T; Hanno A
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):122.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25979219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis.
Hemal AK; Wadhwa SN; Kumar M; Gupta NP
J Urol; 1999 Jul; 162(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10379734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in unusual circumstances--is the outcome comparable to that achieved in familiar pathologies?
Abraham GP; Das K; Ramaswami K; Siddaiah AT; George DP; Abraham JJ; Thampan OS
Urology; 2012 May; 79(5):1057-62. PubMed ID: 22546383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Janetschek G; Peschel R; Altarac S; Bartsch G
Urology; 1996 Mar; 47(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 8633393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels-to transpose or not? The robotic experience.
Boylu U; Oommen M; Lee BR; Thomas R
J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1751-5. PubMed ID: 19233419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic kidney pyeloplasty].
Janetschek G; Peschel R; Bartsch G
Urologe A; 1996 May; 35(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 8711825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Wu JT; Gao ZL; Shi L; Han BM; Men CP; Zhang P; Xia SJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(22):2728-32. PubMed ID: 19951604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]