These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20157666)

  • 21. IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year.
    Taschner M; Frankenberger R; García-Godoy F; Rosenbusch S; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 19281114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Self-adhesive Luting of Partial Ceramic Crowns: Selective Enamel Etching Leads to Higher Survival after 6.5 Years In Vivo.
    Baader K; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 26891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Cements at Different Temperatures on the Clinical Performance and Marginal Adaptation of Inlay-Onlay Restorations In Vivo.
    Aygün Emiroğlu Ş; Evren B; Kulak Özkan Y
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Jun; 25(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 26215702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent.
    Manso AG; González-Lopez S; Bolaños-Carmona V; Maurício PJ; Félix SA; Carvalho PA
    J Adhes Dent; 2011 Oct; 13(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 21246071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
    Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
    Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.
    Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Rubo JH; Santos GC
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 22856680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.
    Hikita K; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Ikeda T; Van Landuyt K; Maida T; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16426673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents.
    Gemalmaz D; Ozcan M; Alkumru HN
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(3):273-83. PubMed ID: 11803715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of a simplified application technique for ceramic inlays on the margin quality.
    Clotten S; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 11725681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system.
    Ferrari M; Dagostin A; Fabianelli A
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 12686290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.
    Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pressable feldspathic inlays in premolars: effect of cementation strategy and mechanical cycling on the adhesive bond between dentin and restoration.
    Feitosa SA; Corazza PH; Cesar PF; Bottino MA; Valandro LF
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Apr; 16(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 24027771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays.
    Fabianelli A; Goracci C; Bertelli E; Monticelli F; Grandini S; Ferrari M
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 15892362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months.
    Vogl V; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Federlin M; Schmalz G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2481-2492. PubMed ID: 26971352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Randomized clinical split-mouth study on the performance of CAD/CAM-partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement or a universal adhesive and a conventional resin cement after 39 months.
    Scholz KJ; Tabenski IM; Vogl V; Cieplik F; Schmalz G; Buchalla W; Hiller KA; Federlin M
    J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103837. PubMed ID: 34624421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel.
    Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.