These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20157666)

  • 41. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: 12-year follow-up.
    Santos MJ; Freitas MC; Azevedo LM; Santos GC; Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Mondelli RF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1683-90. PubMed ID: 26662120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
    Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Six-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays.
    Galiatsatos AA; Bergou D
    Quintessence Int; 2008 May; 39(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 19088955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Thirteen-year randomized controlled clinical trial of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 25637318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents.
    Trajtenberg CP; Caram SJ; Kiat-amnuay S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 18666496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.
    Bortolotto T; Onisor I; Krejci I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 17031673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. IPS Empress onlays luted with two dual-cured resin cements for endodontically treated teeth: a 3-year clinical evaluation.
    Atali PY; Cakmakcioglu O; Topbasi B; Turkmen C; Suslen O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 21210001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The marginal quality of luted ceramic inserts in bovine teeth and ceramic inlays in extracted molars after occlusal loading.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Rousson V
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 16240962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement.
    Ibarra G; Johnson GH; Geurtsen W; Vargas MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 16499961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of two resin cement systems in the adhesion of CAD/CAM-fabricated resin nanoceramic restorations: 18-month preliminary results.
    Canatan S; Oz FD; Bolay S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Oct; 34(7):1005-1014. PubMed ID: 35388956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-cured resin composite luted ceramic inlays. A 5-year clinical evaluation.
    van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2003 Nov; 19(7):670-4. PubMed ID: 12901993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):318-26. PubMed ID: 9855855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive.
    Atalay C; Ozgunaltay G; Yazici AR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 31468262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.