These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20157672)

  • 21. A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt KL; Poitevin A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 20931252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions.
    van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2000 Jul; 16(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 10831784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 2-year Clinical evaluation of sodium hypochlorite treatment in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: a pilot study.
    Saboia Vde P; Almeida PC; Rittet AV; Swift EJ; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 17024939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bond strength of resin-based restorations polymerized with different light-curing sources.
    D'Alpino PH; Wang L; Rueggeberg FA; Svizero NR; Pereira JC; Pashley DH; Carvalho RM
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Oct; 8(5):293-8. PubMed ID: 17080876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions--results at 3 years.
    Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1089-94. PubMed ID: 21789590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Onal B; Pamir T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1547-55. PubMed ID: 16329418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner.
    Efes BG; Dörter C; Gömeç Y; Koray F
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16708724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 3-year clinical effectiveness of one-step adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Moretto SG; Russo EM; Carvalho RC; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Cardoso MV
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 23747824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of different adhesives used in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
    Tuncer D; Yazici AR; Özgünaltay G; Dayangac B
    Aust Dent J; 2013 Mar; 58(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 23441798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-year prospective clinical performance of a one-step self-etch adhesive and a nanofiller hybrid resin composite in Class V lesions.
    Preussker S; Pöschmann M; Kensche A; Natusch I; Koch R; Klimm W; Hannig C
    Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 25000664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimal depth of cure for nanohybrid resin composite using quartz tungsten halogen and new high intensity light-emitting diode curing units.
    Tanthanuch S; Ruengsri P; Kukiattrakoon B
    Gen Dent; 2013 Aug; 61(5):e14-7. PubMed ID: 23928448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of microhybrid composites in noncarious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
    Tuncer D; Çelik C; Yamanel K; Arhun N
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 20(2):176-181. PubMed ID: 28091433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.