BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

623 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20159127)

  • 1. Responsiveness of mobility, daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living outcome measures for geriatric rehabilitation.
    Demers L; Desrosiers J; Nikolova R; Robichaud L; Bravo G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 91(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 20159127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive validity of the classification schema for functional mobility tests in instrumental activities of daily living decline among older adults.
    Shimada H; Sawyer P; Harada K; Kaneya S; Nihei K; Asakawa Y; Yoshii C; Hagiwara A; Furuna T; Ishizaki T
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 91(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 20159128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the responsiveness of the FIM and the interRAI post acute care assessment instrument in rehabilitation of older adults.
    Glenny C; Stolee P; Husted J; Thompson M; Berg K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 91(7):1038-43. PubMed ID: 20537315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of 3 physical performance measures in inpatient geriatric rehabilitation.
    Brooks D; Davis AM; Naglie G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 16401447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pattern of functional change during rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture.
    Latham NK; Jette DU; Warren RL; Wirtalla C
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 16401448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Underestimating physical function gains: comparing FIM motor subscale and interRAI post acute care activities of daily living scale.
    Glenny C; Stolee P; Thompson M; Husted J; Berg K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 93(6):1000-8. PubMed ID: 22497989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The lower-limb tasks questionnaire: an assessment of validity, reliability, responsiveness, and minimal important differences.
    McNair PJ; Prapavessis H; Collier J; Bassett S; Bryant A; Larmer P
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Aug; 88(8):993-1001. PubMed ID: 17678661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes.
    Haley SM; Siebens H; Coster WJ; Tao W; Black-Schaffer RM; Gandek B; Sinclair SJ; Ni P
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Aug; 87(8):1033-42. PubMed ID: 16876547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional and self-efficacy changes of patients admitted to a Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit.
    McCloskey R
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Apr; 46(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 15056332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain.
    Coster WJ; Haley SM; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Bond TL; Ni PS
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I62-72. PubMed ID: 14707756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Incidence of the onset of disability and recovery of functional autonomy among the very old after one year].
    Lefrançois R; Hébert R; Dubé M; Leclerc G; Hamel S; Gaulin P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Apr; 48(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10804423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does functional change predict the course of improvement in geriatric inpatient rehabilitation?
    Denkinger MD; Igl W; Jamour M; Bader A; Bailer S; Lukas A; Nikolaus T
    Clin Rehabil; 2010 May; 24(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 20354056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Outpatient geriatric rehabilitation: an evaluation of two models assessing trends of medical outcomes].
    Meinck M; Freigang K; John B; Keitel C; Puls E; Robra BP
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Feb; 42(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 12561000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of an adapted falls efficacy scale in older rehabilitation patients.
    Büla CJ; Martin E; Rochat S; Piot-Ziegler C
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Feb; 89(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 18226653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using timed up and go and usual gait speed to predict incident disability in daily activities among community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older.
    Donoghue OA; Savva GM; Cronin H; Kenny RA; Horgan NF
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Oct; 95(10):1954-61. PubMed ID: 24977931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does functionally based activity make a difference to health status and mobility? A randomised controlled trial in residential care facilities (The Promoting Independent Living Study; PILS).
    Peri K; Kerse N; Robinson E; Parsons M; Parsons J; Latham N
    Age Ageing; 2008 Jan; 37(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 17965045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) items were stable over time in a longitudinal study on aging.
    Finlayson M; Mallinson T; Barbosa VM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):338-49. PubMed ID: 15862719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation and application of the General Motor Function assessment scale in geriatric rehabilitation.
    Aberg AC; Lindmark B; Lithell H
    Disabil Rehabil; 2003 Apr; 25(7):360-8. PubMed ID: 12745960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timed "up & go" test as a predictor of falls within 6 months after hip fracture surgery.
    Kristensen MT; Foss NB; Kehlet H
    Phys Ther; 2007 Jan; 87(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 17142643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anemia and recovery from disability in activities of daily living in hospitalized older persons.
    Maraldi C; Volpato S; Cesari M; Cavalieri M; Onder G; Mangani I; Woodman RC; Fellin R; Pahor M;
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2006 Apr; 54(4):632-6. PubMed ID: 16686874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.