These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography. Lee YJ; Lim YS; Lim HW; Yoo WJ; Choi BG; Kim BS Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):1000-7. PubMed ID: 24107930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. Min JK; Swaminathan RV; Vass M; Gallagher S; Weinsaft JW J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 19577213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of vertebral artery stents using 16-slice multi-detector row CT angiography in vivo evaluation: comparison of a medium-smooth kernel and a sharp kernel. Yoo WJ; Lim YS; Ahn KJ; Choi BG; Kim JY; Kim SH Eur J Radiol; 2009 May; 70(2):362-8. PubMed ID: 18359179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronary stent imaging with dual-source CT: assessment of lumen visibility using different convolution kernels and postprocessing filters. Ulrich A; Burg MC; Raupach R; Bunck A; Schuelke C; Maintz D; Heindel W; Seifarth H Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 24399513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis. Andreini D; Pontone G; Bartorelli AL; Trabattoni D; Mushtaq S; Bertella E; Annoni A; Formenti A; Cortinovis S; Montorsi P; Veglia F; Ballerini G; Pepi M Am J Cardiol; 2009 May; 103(10):1349-58. PubMed ID: 19427427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. Gaspar T; Halon DA; Lewis BS; Adawi S; Schliamser JE; Rubinshtein R; Flugelman MY; Peled N J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(8):1573-9. PubMed ID: 16226187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis. Manghat N; Van Lingen R; Hewson P; Syed F; Kakani N; Cox I; Roobottom C; Morgan-Hughes G Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 101(11):1567-73. PubMed ID: 18489934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is coronary stent assessment improved with spectral analysis of dual energy CT? Halpern EJ; Halpern DJ; Yanof JH; Amin-Spector S; Fischman D; Aviram G; Sosna J Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19523853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid enhanced multidetector computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; Bettinotti M; Goldsmit A; Deviggiano A; Carrascosa J; García MJ J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2007 Oct; 1(2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19083885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Rist C; von Ziegler F; Nikolaou K; Kirchin MA; Wintersperger BJ; Johnson TR; Knez A; Leber AW; Reiser MF; Becker CR Acad Radiol; 2006 Dec; 13(12):1465-73. PubMed ID: 17138114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Carbone I; Francone M; Algeri E; Granatelli A; Napoli A; Kirchin MA; Catalano C; Passariello R Eur Radiol; 2008 Feb; 18(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 17929024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Das KM; El-Menyar AA; Salam AM; Singh R; Dabdoob WA; Albinali HA; Al Suwaidi J Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 17890354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impairment factors for evaluating the patency of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in coronary arteries by 64-slice computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography. Nakamura K; Funabashi N; Uehara M; Suzuki K; Terao M; Okubo K; Mita Y; Maeda F; Komuro I Int J Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 130(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 18180050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]