86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20159635)
1. Screening asymptomatic firefighters.
Fleet S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(1):75; author reply 75. PubMed ID: 20159635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Faced with an abnormal stress electrocardiogram, the next test should be a ...?
Al-Mallah M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(5):331-3. PubMed ID: 19818322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of multidetector computed tomography compared with myocardial perfusion imaging as gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography in asymptomatic firefighters with positive treadmill tests.
Budoff MJ; Karwasky R; Ahmadi N; Nasserian C; Pratt F; Stephens J; Chang WW; Flores FR; Rizzo JA; Gunnarsson CL; McKay CR
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 19818321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive diagnosis and prognosis assessment in chronic coronary artery disease: stress testing with and without imaging perspective.
Gibbons RJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Nov; 1(3):257-69; discussion 269. PubMed ID: 19808550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease.
Meyer M; Nance JW; Schoepf UJ; Moscariello A; Weininger M; Rowe GW; Ruzsics B; Kang DK; Chiaramida SA; Schoenberg SO; Fink C; Henzler T
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3719-25. PubMed ID: 21277132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronary angiographic evaluation of low-risk chest pain in the emergency department CT-STAT, or maybe not quite that fast?
Salerno M; Bourque JM; Beller GA
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 58(14):1423-5. PubMed ID: 21939823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rationale and design of a randomized trial comparing initial stress echocardiography versus coronary CT angiography in low-to-intermediate risk emergency department patients with chest pain.
Levsky JM; Haramati LB; Taub CC; Spevack DM; Menegus MA; Travin MI; Vega S; Lerer R; Brown-Manhertz D; Hirschhorn E; Tobin JN; Garcia MJ
Echocardiography; 2014 Jul; 31(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 24372760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging: war or peace?
Chinnaiyan KM; Voros S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(4):284-6. PubMed ID: 22732202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost analysis of initial computed tomography angiography vs cardiac catheterization.
Fleet S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2007 Oct; 1(2):124; author reply 124. PubMed ID: 19083894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in evaluation of patients without symptoms who have positive stress test results.
Halpern EJ; Savage MP; Fischman DL; Levin DC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1257-62. PubMed ID: 20410412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Will robust evidence drive appropriate utilization of CTA?
Wann S; Shaw LJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2007 Jul; 1(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 19083873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision analytic model for evaluation of suspected coronary disease with stress testing and coronary CT angiography.
Halpern EJ; Fischman D; Savage MP; Koka AR; DeCaro M; Levin DC
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):577-86. PubMed ID: 20171906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac computed tomography as a cost-effective approach for diagnosing coronary artery disease?
Becker HC
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2012 Jul; 10(7):823-5. PubMed ID: 22908913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The new healthcare payment system: can coronary CT angiography help?
Lesser JR
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 23452998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Coronary calcium screening.
Newman TB; Pletcher MJ
N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(25):2491; author reply 2491-2. PubMed ID: 20050217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients with chest pain.
Ladapo JA; Jaffer FA; Hoffmann U; Thomson CC; Bamberg F; Dec W; Cutler DM; Weinstein MC; Gazelle GS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 54(25):2409-22. PubMed ID: 20082932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography or exercise electrocardiogram in individuals without known cardiovascular disease.
Park GM; Kim SH; Jo MW; Her SH; Han S; Ahn JM; Park DW; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Kim BJ; Koh JM; Kim HK; Choe J; Park SW; Park SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 May; 94(21):e917. PubMed ID: 26020405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FFRCT: Solid PLATFORM or Thin Ice?
Hulten E; Di Carli MF
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 66(21):2324-2328. PubMed ID: 26475206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Budget impact of applying appropriateness criteria for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: The perspective of a developing country.
Dos Santos MA; Santos MS; Tura BR; Félix R; Brito ASX; De Lorenzo A
J Nucl Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1160-1165. PubMed ID: 27229342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost implications of initial computed tomography angiography as opposed to catheterization in patients with mildly abnormal or equivocal myocardial perfusion scans.
Cole JH; Chunn VM; Morrow JA; Buckley RS; Phillips GM
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2007 Jul; 1(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 19083872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
