These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Importance of volumetric measurement processes in oncology imaging trials for screening and evaluation of tumors as per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Vemuri RC; Jarecha R; Hwi KK; Gundamaraju R; Maruthikanth A; Kulkarni A; Reddy S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(5):2375-8. PubMed ID: 24716987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations with the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) guidance in disseminated pediatric malignancy. Barnacle AM; McHugh K Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2006 Feb; 46(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 16231313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST): problems and need for modifications in paediatric oncology? McHugh K; Kao S Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):433-6. PubMed ID: 12857700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A radiologist's guide to treatment response criteria in oncologic imaging: anatomic imaging biomarkers. Rezai P; Pisaneschi MJ; Feng C; Yaghmai V AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 23883205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: until when? Nannini M; Pantaleo MA; Maleddu A; Al-Nahhas A; Rubello D; Fanti S; Biasco G Nucl Med Commun; 2009 Mar; 30(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 19262278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary. Are current tumour response criteria relevant for the 21st century? Padhani AR; Husband JE Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1031-3. PubMed ID: 11271893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the response to therapy of neoplastic lesions. Bellomi M; Preda L Radiol Med; 2004; 107(5-6):450-8. PubMed ID: 15195007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic imaging in the assessment of the therapeutic response in oncology]. Ferrozzi F; Ganzetti A; Campani R Radiol Med; 1999; 97(1-2):8-18. PubMed ID: 10319094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the Usefulness of the Quantitative Methods for the Response Evaluation of Solid Tumors: Analysis Using Four Cancer Types. Canals-Lambarri M; Canals-Cifuentes A; Barros-Rocco A; Barros-Nelson P; Mahave-Caceres M; Salman-Boghikian P Rev Invest Clin; 2015; 67(3):182-90. PubMed ID: 26202742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging in the evaluation of response to treatment in oncology. Bisi G Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jun; 62(2):127-128. PubMed ID: 29745214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Padhani AR; Ollivier L Br J Radiol; 2001 Nov; 74(887):983-6. PubMed ID: 11709461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiological monitoring of the treatment of solid tumors in practice. Ganten MK; Ganten TM; Schlemmer HP Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 24563412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New technologies and directed agents for applications of cancer imaging. Atri M J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(20):3299-308. PubMed ID: 16829654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging: a sisyphean search for the elusive tissue signature. Rogers LF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):557. PubMed ID: 12185017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Use of PET for evaluation of treatment response in oncology]. Bourguet P Cancer Radiother; 2006 Nov; 10(6-7):334-7. PubMed ID: 16950641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]