BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20159914)

  • 1. Image rejects/retakes--radiographic challenges.
    Waaler D; Hofmann B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 20159914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.
    Nol J; Isouard G; Mirecki J
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic image reject rate analysis and cause - A National Maltese Study.
    Mercieca N; Portelli JL; Jadva-Patel H
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28290336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To keep or reject, that is the question - A survey on radiologists and radiographers' assessments of plain radiography images.
    Kjelle E; Schanche AK; Hafskjold L
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):115-119. PubMed ID: 32682730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed radiography: its impact on radiographers.
    Cesar LJ
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 9008016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image rejects in general direct digital radiography.
    Hofmann B; Rosanowsky TB; Jensen C; Wah KH
    Acta Radiol Open; 2015 Oct; 4(10):2058460115604339. PubMed ID: 26500784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital intraoral imaging: analysis of retakes and reduction in radiation exposure using rectangular collimation.
    Vijayan S; Shah N; Potluri A
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(6):66-70. PubMed ID: 36288078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose.
    Uffmann M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 19628349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography.
    Hasaneen M; AlHameli N; AlMinhali A; Alshehhi S; Salih S; Alomaim MM
    J Med Life; 2023 May; 16(5):731-735. PubMed ID: 37520472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
    Lee JK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical utility of ultra-low-dose pre-test exposure to avoid unnecessary patient exposure due to positioning errors: a simulation study.
    Nose H; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Dec; 10(4):489-495. PubMed ID: 28895040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ICRP recommendations on 'Managing patient dose in digital radiology'.
    Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):126-30. PubMed ID: 15933093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
    Kullman L; Joseph B
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.