These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20159914)

  • 1. Image rejects/retakes--radiographic challenges.
    Waaler D; Hofmann B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 20159914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.
    Nol J; Isouard G; Mirecki J
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic image reject rate analysis and cause - A National Maltese Study.
    Mercieca N; Portelli JL; Jadva-Patel H
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28290336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To keep or reject, that is the question - A survey on radiologists and radiographers' assessments of plain radiography images.
    Kjelle E; Schanche AK; Hafskjold L
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):115-119. PubMed ID: 32682730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed radiography: its impact on radiographers.
    Cesar LJ
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 9008016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image rejects in general direct digital radiography.
    Hofmann B; Rosanowsky TB; Jensen C; Wah KH
    Acta Radiol Open; 2015 Oct; 4(10):2058460115604339. PubMed ID: 26500784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital intraoral imaging: analysis of retakes and reduction in radiation exposure using rectangular collimation.
    Vijayan S; Shah N; Potluri A
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(6):66-70. PubMed ID: 36288078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose.
    Uffmann M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 19628349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of image rejection in digital radiography.
    Hasaneen M; AlHameli N; AlMinhali A; Alshehhi S; Salih S; Alomaim MM
    J Med Life; 2023 May; 16(5):731-735. PubMed ID: 37520472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
    Lee JK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical utility of ultra-low-dose pre-test exposure to avoid unnecessary patient exposure due to positioning errors: a simulation study.
    Nose H; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Dec; 10(4):489-495. PubMed ID: 28895040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ICRP recommendations on 'Managing patient dose in digital radiology'.
    Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):126-30. PubMed ID: 15933093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
    Kullman L; Joseph B
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.