These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20160267)

  • 1. The potential of genes and other markers to inform about risk.
    Pepe MS; Gu JW; Morris DE
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Mar; 19(3):655-65. PubMed ID: 20160267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of biomarker data: logs, odds ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Grund B; Sabin C
    Curr Opin HIV AIDS; 2010 Nov; 5(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 20978390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives.
    Steyerberg EW; Vedder MM; Leening MJ; Postmus D; D'Agostino RB; Van Calster B; Pencina MJ
    Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):556-70. PubMed ID: 25042996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of clinical validity of a breast cancer risk model combining genetic and clinical information.
    Mealiffe ME; Stokowski RP; Rhees BK; Prentice RL; Pettinger M; Hinds DA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Nov; 102(21):1618-27. PubMed ID: 20956782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unifying framework for evaluating the predictive power of genetic variants based on the level of heritability explained.
    So HC; Sham PC
    PLoS Genet; 2010 Dec; 6(12):e1001230. PubMed ID: 21151957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models.
    Verbakel JY; Steyerberg EW; Uno H; De Cock B; Wynants L; Collins GS; Van Calster B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():207-216. PubMed ID: 32712176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical methods for assessment of added usefulness of new biomarkers.
    Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Vasan RS
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Dec; 48(12):1703-11. PubMed ID: 20716010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Net risk reclassification p values: valid or misleading?
    Pepe MS; Janes H; Li CI
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Apr; 106(4):dju041. PubMed ID: 24681599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple SNP testing improves risk prediction of first venous thrombosis.
    de Haan HG; Bezemer ID; Doggen CJ; Le Cessie S; Reitsma PH; Arellano AR; Tong CH; Devlin JJ; Bare LA; Rosendaal FR; Vossen CY
    Blood; 2012 Jul; 120(3):656-63. PubMed ID: 22586183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining Risk of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Based on Epidemiologic Factors and Genetic Variants.
    Dong J; Buas MF; Gharahkhani P; Kendall BJ; Onstad L; Zhao S; Anderson LA; Wu AH; Ye W; Bird NC; Bernstein L; Chow WH; Gammon MD; Liu G; Caldas C; Pharoah PD; Risch HA; Iyer PG; Reid BJ; Hardie LJ; Lagergren J; Shaheen NJ; Corley DA; Fitzgerald RC; ; Whiteman DC; Vaughan TL; Thrift AP
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Apr; 154(5):1273-1281.e3. PubMed ID: 29247777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Venous Thrombosis Risk after Cast Immobilization of the Lower Extremity: Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Score, L-TRiP(cast), in Three Population-Based Case-Control Studies.
    Nemeth B; van Adrichem RA; van Hylckama Vlieg A; Bucciarelli P; Martinelli I; Baglin T; Rosendaal FR; le Cessie S; Cannegieter SC
    PLoS Med; 2015 Nov; 12(11):e1001899; discussion e1001899. PubMed ID: 26554832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the Four Kallikrein Panel of the 4Kscore for Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer in Men in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.
    Lin DW; Newcomb LF; Brown MD; Sjoberg DD; Dong Y; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg M; Dash A; Ellis WJ; Fabrizio M; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Zheng Y;
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):448-454. PubMed ID: 27889277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the addition of information on genotype improve prediction of the risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer beyond that obtained from skin phenotype?
    Dwyer T; Stankovich JM; Blizzard L; FitzGerald LM; Dickinson JL; Reilly A; Williamson J; Ashbolt R; Berwick M; Sale MM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 May; 159(9):826-33. PubMed ID: 15105175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients.
    Bertges DJ; Goodney PP; Zhao Y; Schanzer A; Nolan BW; Likosky DS; Eldrup-Jorgensen J; Cronenwett JL;
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 52(3):674-83, 683.e1-683.e3. PubMed ID: 20570467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value of genetic profiling for the prediction of coronary heart disease.
    van der Net JB; Janssens AC; Sijbrands EJ; Steyerberg EW
    Am Heart J; 2009 Jul; 158(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19540399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinically relevant measures of fit? A note of caution.
    Cook NR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22875759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Allotey J; Snell KI; Smuk M; Hooper R; Chan CL; Ahmed A; Chappell LC; von Dadelszen P; Dodds J; Green M; Kenny L; Khalil A; Khan KS; Mol BW; Myers J; Poston L; Thilaganathan B; Staff AC; Smith GC; Ganzevoort W; Laivuori H; Odibo AO; Ramírez JA; Kingdom J; Daskalakis G; Farrar D; Baschat AA; Seed PT; Prefumo F; da Silva Costa F; Groen H; Audibert F; Masse J; Skråstad RB; Salvesen KÅ; Haavaldsen C; Nagata C; Rumbold AR; Heinonen S; Askie LM; Smits LJ; Vinter CA; Magnus PM; Eero K; Villa PM; Jenum AK; Andersen LB; Norman JE; Ohkuchi A; Eskild A; Bhattacharya S; McAuliffe FM; Galindo A; Herraiz I; Carbillon L; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Yeo S; Teede HJ; Browne JL; Moons KG; Riley RD; Thangaratinam S
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Dec; 24(72):1-252. PubMed ID: 33336645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction: decision analysis to the rescue.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS
    Discov Med; 2012 Sep; 14(76):181-8. PubMed ID: 23021372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.