These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20161117)

  • 1. Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.
    Brown-Schmidt S
    J Mem Lang; 2009 Aug; 61(2):171-190. PubMed ID: 20161117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partner-specific adaptation in dialog.
    Brennan SE; Hanna JE
    Top Cogn Sci; 2009 Apr; 1(2):274-91. PubMed ID: 25164933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjusting conceptual pacts in three-party conversation.
    Yoon SO; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):919-37. PubMed ID: 24707779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Flexibility of Conceptual Pacts: Referring Expressions Dynamically Shift to Accommodate New Conceptualizations.
    Ibarra A; Tanenhaus MK
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():561. PubMed ID: 27199801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: a targeted language game approach.
    Brown-Schmidt S; Tanenhaus MK
    Cogn Sci; 2008 Jun; 32(4):643-684. PubMed ID: 19890480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Global Similarities and Multifaceted Differences in the Production of Partner-Specific Referential Pacts by Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
    Nadig A; Seth S; Sasson M
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1888. PubMed ID: 26733897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What's New to You? Preschoolers' Partner-Specific Online Processing of Disfluency.
    Yoon SO; Jin KS; Brown-Schmidt S; Fisher CL
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():612601. PubMed ID: 33488480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Referential processing in 3- and 5-year-old children is egocentrically anchored.
    Ostashchenko E; Deliens G; Geelhand P; Bertels J; Kissine M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1387-1397. PubMed ID: 30284869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compensating for an Inattentive Audience.
    Craycraft NN; Brown-Schmidt S
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29781130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the influence of local and personal common ground on memory for conversation using an online referential communication task.
    Nault DR; Voleti R; Nicastro M; Munhall KG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1598-1621. PubMed ID: 36795429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keeping track of who knows what in multiparty conversation despite severe memory impairment.
    Yoon SO; Duff MC; Brown-Schmidt S
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Feb; 194():108780. PubMed ID: 38159800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of partner-specific memory associations on language production: Evidence from picture naming.
    Horton WS
    Lang Cogn Process; 2007; 22(7):1114-1139. PubMed ID: 18584063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing Speaker-Specific Information in Two Stages During the Interpretation of Referential Precedents.
    Kronmüller E; Guerra E
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():552368. PubMed ID: 33329183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of preserved audience design with aging in interactive conversation.
    Yoon SO; Stine-Morrow EAL
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Jun; 34(4):613-623. PubMed ID: 30973242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names.
    Gegg-Harrison WM; Tanenhaus MK
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():212. PubMed ID: 26955361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. That's not what you said earlier: preschoolers expect partners to be referentially consistent.
    Graham SA; Sedivy J; Khu M
    J Child Lang; 2014 Jan; 41(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 23398907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Referential Form and Memory for the Discourse History.
    Yoon SO; Benjamin AS; Brown-Schmidt S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12964. PubMed ID: 33873236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social affiliation is sufficient to provoke the partner-advantage.
    Tseng CH; Jingling L; Cheng M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21293. PubMed ID: 36494379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined effects of age and hearing impairment on utterances and requests for clarification in spontaneous conversation and a referential communication task.
    Ellis RJ; Rönnberg J; Plejert C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024; 59(1):293-303. PubMed ID: 37589337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.