272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20162104)
1. Quantifying the influence of bone density and thickness on resonance frequency analysis: an in vitro study of biomechanical test materials.
Bardyn T; Gédet P; Hallermann W; Büchler P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1006-14. PubMed ID: 20162104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis of methods used to assess implant stability.
Cehreli MC; Karasoy D; Akca K; Eckert SE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1015-32. PubMed ID: 20162105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: an in vitro study.
Ahn SJ; Leesungbok R; Lee SW; Heo YK; Kang KL
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 22633592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant stability and bone density: assessment of correlation in fresh cadavers using conventional and osteotome implant sockets.
Cehreli MC; Kökat AM; Comert A; Akkocaoğlu M; Tekdemir I; Akça K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19681964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible.
Trisi P; Todisco M; Consolo U; Travaglini D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):837-49. PubMed ID: 21841994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mineralized bone-implant contact and implant stability quotient in 16 human implants retrieved after early healing periods: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation.
Degidi M; Perrotti V; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 20209186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Yilmaz B; Bilecenoglu B; Ozbek EN
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18384400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of factors influencing resonance frequency analysis values, at insertion surgery, of implants placed in sinus-augmented and nongrafted sites.
Degidi M; Daprile G; Piattelli A; Carinci F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 17716258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A resonance frequency analysis assessment of maxillary and mandibular immediately loaded implants.
Balshi SF; Allen FD; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):584-94. PubMed ID: 16161743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: a retrospective histological and histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans.
Scarano A; Degidi M; Iezzi G; Petrone G; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 17100747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface.
Aparicio C; Lang NP; Rangert B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():2-7. PubMed ID: 16968377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is insertion torque correlated to bone-implant contact percentage in the early healing period? A histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of 17 human-retrieved dental implants.
Degidi M; Perrotti V; Strocchi R; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):778-81. PubMed ID: 19486080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. RFA values of implants placed in sinus grafted and nongrafted sites after 6 and 12 months.
Degidi M; Daprile G; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 18783420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone.
Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bozdag E; Sünbüloğlu E; Kutay O
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):900-7. PubMed ID: 20529176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relevance of resonance frequency analysis to evaluate dental implant stability: simulation and histomorphometrical animal experiments.
Ito Y; Sato D; Yoneda S; Ito D; Kondo H; Kasugai S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 17986265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants.
O'Sullivan D; Sennerby L; Meredith N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 15248883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
