These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20162107)
1. Stress analysis in simulation models with or without implant threads representation. Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; de Sousa EA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1040-4. PubMed ID: 20162107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dynamic natures of implant loading. Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant. Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants. Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis. Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type. Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study. Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress and strain analysis of the bone-implant interface: a comparison of fiber-reinforced composite and titanium implants utilizing 3-dimensional finite element study. Shinya A; Ballo AM; Lassila LV; Shinya A; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():133-40. PubMed ID: 20545537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis. Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs. Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants. Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]