267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20162108)
1. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Kim MJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 20162108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
Choi JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress levels for well-fitting implant superstructures as a function of tightening force levels, tightening sequence, and different operators.
Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 11458260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque.
Dailey B; Jordan L; Blind O; Tavernier B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 19492640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prosthetic screw detorque values in implants retained as cast bar superstructures or bars modified by the Cresco Ti Precision technique--a comparative in vivo study.
Schmitt J; Holst S; Eitner S; Schlegel A; Wichmann M; Hamel J
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 19418868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-load on oral implants after screw tightening fixed full prostheses: an in vivo study.
Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 28(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 11350577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of tightening sequence and method on screw preload in implant superstructures.
Al-Sahan MM; Al Maflehi NS; Akeel RF
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 24392482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of prosthesis fit and the effect of a luting system on the prosthetic connection preload: an in vitro study.
Duyck J; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 12170855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of different tightening forces before laser welding to the implant/framework fit.
da Silveira-Júnior CD; Neves FD; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Prado CJ; Simamoto-Júnior PC
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 19210612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part I. The effects of tightening the gold screws and placement of a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 8603168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Operator-induced compressive axial forces during implant gold screw fastening.
Pesun IJ; Brosky ME; Korioth TW; Hodges J; Devoe BJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 11458259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.
Chen J; Tomotake Y; Watanabe M; Ishida Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 21691614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
Lee JH; Kim DG; Park CJ; Cho LR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e83-9. PubMed ID: 23088616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
