268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20162108)
21. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy.
Millington ND; Leung T
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 8595110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the passivity between cast alloy and laser-welded titanium overdenture bars.
Paiva J; Givan DA; Broome JC; Lemons JE; McCracken MS
J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):656-62. PubMed ID: 19682220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Immediate occlusal loading of Osseotite implants in mandibular edentulous patients: a prospective observational report with 18-month data.
Drago CJ; Lazzara RJ
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 16681501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
Haack JE; Sakaguchi RL; Sun T; Coffey JP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 7590997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. External hexagon and internal hexagon in straight and offset implant placement: strain gauge analysis.
Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LG; de Melo Nishioka LN
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 20009605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
Wise M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study.
Collaert B; De Bruyn H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1254-60. PubMed ID: 19040440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Loss of preload in screwed implant joints as a function of time and tightening/untightening sequences.
Bernardes SR; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M; Hobkirk J; Ribeiro RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 24451858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.
Lang LA; Kang B; Wang RF; Lang BR
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 14668754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
Kim KS; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Yang JH; Lee JB; Yim SH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21198900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.
Cantwell A; Hobkirk JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 14982365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
