590 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20162113)
1. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Yilmaz B; Bilecenoglu B; Ozbek EN
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18384400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Buser D; Nydegger T; Hirt HP; Cochran DL; Nolte LP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of loaded and unloaded implants with different surfaces.
Nergiz I; Arpak N; Bostanci H; Scorziello TM; Schmage P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 19492645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Carinci F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 17066638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs.
Valderrama P; Bornstein MM; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom FL; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1025-34. PubMed ID: 21142981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible.
Trisi P; Todisco M; Consolo U; Travaglini D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):837-49. PubMed ID: 21841994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study.
Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Menini M; Ravera G; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 18456046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs: follow-up of implant stability and implant failures.
Nkenke E; Lehner B; Fenner M; Roman FS; Thams U; Neukam FW; Radespiel-Tröger M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 15747672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removal torque of immediately loaded transitional endosseous implants in human subjects.
Simon H; Caputo AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 12507244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reverse-torque failure of screw-shaped implants in baboons after 6 months of healing.
Carr AB; Beals DW; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 9337019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial torque stability of a new bone condensing dental implant. A cohort study of 140 consecutively placed implants.
Irinakis T; Wiebe C
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(6):277-82. PubMed ID: 20017643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone response to unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula: an animal study in the Yorkshire pig.
Rohner D; Meng CS; Hutmacher DW; Tsai KT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 32(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 14505621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
