351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20163075)
1. Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms.
Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Johnson N
J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 20163075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.
Lim DH; Keum JE; Ju WK; Lee JH; Chung TY; Chung ES
J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 23820228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
von Jagow B; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19101422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of LASEK and LASIK with thin and ultrathin flaps after excimer laser ablation with the SCHWIND Aspheric ablation profile.
Arbelaez MC; Vidal C; Arba Mosquera S
J Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 27(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 20438023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 2 femtosecond lasers.
Zheng Y; Zhou Y; Zhang J; Liu Q; Zhai C; Wang Y
Cornea; 2015 Mar; 34(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 25603229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized comparison of four femtosecond LASIK flap thicknesses.
Prakash G; Agarwal A; Yadav A; Jacob S; Kumar DA; Agarwal A; Akhtar R
J Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 26(6):392-402. PubMed ID: 20677726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy, safety, and flap dimensions of a new femtosecond laser for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Vryghem JC; Devogelaere T; Stodulka P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 20202543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement.
Muallem MS; Yoo SH; Romano AC; Marangon FB; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2295-302. PubMed ID: 15519078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors of femtosecond laser flap thickness measured by online optical coherence pachymetry subtraction in sub-Bowman keratomileusis.
Pfaeffl WA; Kunze M; Zenk U; Pfaeffl MB; Schuster T; Lohmann C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1872-80. PubMed ID: 19006732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective, contralateral comparison of 120-μm and 90-μm LASIK flaps using the IntraLase FS60 femtosecond laser.
Moshirfar M; Hatch BB; Chang JC; Kurz CJ; Eugarrios MF; Mifflin MD
J Refract Surg; 2011 Apr; 27(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 20672771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction.
Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M
J Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 29(12):810-5. PubMed ID: 24168787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thresholds for interface haze formation after thin-flap femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Rocha KM; Kagan R; Smith SD; Krueger RR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 147(6):966-72, 972.e1. PubMed ID: 19327748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LASIK for myopia using the Zeiss VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser.
Blum M; Kunert K; Gille A; Sekundo W
J Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 25(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 19431925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.
Rosa AM; Neto Murta J; Quadrado MJ; Tavares C; Lobo C; Van Velze R; Castanheira-Dinis A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 19393881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond-laser technology.
Kymionis GD; Kontadakis GA; Grentzelos MA; Panagopoulou SI; Stojanovic N; Kankariya VP; Henderson BA; Pallikaris IG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1366-71. PubMed ID: 23820304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flap thickness reproducibility in laser in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser: optical coherence tomography measurement.
Kim JH; Lee D; Rhee KI
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 18165093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lenticule thickness readout for small incision lenticule extraction compared to artemis three-dimensional very high-frequency digital ultrasound stromal measurements.
Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M
J Refract Surg; 2014 May; 30(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 24893355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis reoperation outcomes with the Moria M2 head 90 and 130 following previous photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis.
Pitkänen A; Pietilä J; Mäkinen P; Huhtala A; Uusitalo H
Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 88(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 19416118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single versus double femtosecond laser pass for incomplete laser in situ keratomileusis flap in contralateral eyes: visual and optical outcomes.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Javaloy J; García-Lázaro S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 22153090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
