BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20163230)

  • 1. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers' perspectives.
    Overeem K; Lombarts MJ; Arah OA; Klazinga NS; Grol RP; Wollersheim HC
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 20163230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.
    Lockyer J
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2003; 23(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12739254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors.
    Burford B; Illing J; Kergon C; Morrow G; Livingston M
    Med Educ; 2010 Feb; 44(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 20059677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.
    Archer JC; McAvoy P
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 21848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of multi-source feedback on developmental plans for leaders of postgraduate medical education.
    Malling B; Bonderup T; Mortensen L; Ringsted C; Scherpbier A
    Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 19161487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.
    Hassell A; Bullock A; Whitehouse A; Wood L; Jones P; Wall D
    Postgrad Med J; 2012 Jan; 88(1035):10-4. PubMed ID: 22052883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study.
    Overeem K; Wollersheim H; Driessen E; Lombarts K; van de Ven G; Grol R; Arah O
    Med Educ; 2009 Sep; 43(9):874-82. PubMed ID: 19709012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Directed" self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context.
    Sargeant J; Mann K; van der Vleuten C; Metsemakers J
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2008; 28(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18366127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the 360 degrees multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism.
    Berk RA
    Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1073-80. PubMed ID: 19995170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.
    Sneed RC; May WL; Stencel C
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e612-25. PubMed ID: 15520092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness.
    Sargeant J; Mann K; Ferrier S
    Med Educ; 2005 May; 39(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 15842684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is a good general practitioner (GP)? The development and evaluation of a multi-source feedback instrument for GP appraisal.
    Shepherd A; Lough M
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May; 21(3):149-64. PubMed ID: 20515544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promoting physicians' self-assessment and quality improvement: the ABIM diabetes practice improvement module.
    Holmboe ES; Meehan TP; Lynn L; Doyle P; Sherwin T; Duffy FD
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2006; 26(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 16802312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multisource feedback for radiation oncologists.
    Vinod SK; Lonergan DM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 57(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 23721151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.
    Moonen-van Loon JM; Overeem K; Govaerts MJ; Verhoeven BH; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 25993283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess multiple physician competencies in postgraduate training.
    Jefferies A; Simmons B; Tabak D; McIlroy JH; Lee KS; Roukema H; Skidmore M
    Med Teach; 2007 Mar; 29(2-3):183-91. PubMed ID: 17701631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physicians' perceptions of the effect on clinical services of an alternative funding plan at an academic health sciences centre.
    Godwin M; Shortt S; McIntosh L; Bolton C
    CMAJ; 1999 Jun; 160(12):1710-4. PubMed ID: 10410632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review.
    Hall W; Violato C; Lewkonia R; Lockyer J; Fidler H; Toews J; Jennett P; Donoff M; Moores D
    CMAJ; 1999 Jul; 161(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 10420867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Method for evaluating the competence of specialists--the validation of 360-degree-questionnaire].
    Nørgaard K; Pedersen J; Ravn L; Albrecht-Beste E; Holck K; Fredløv M; Møller LK
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Apr; 172(16):1201-6. PubMed ID: 20423662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinicians and dyslexia--a computer-based assessment of one of the key cognitive skills involved in drug administration.
    Millward LJ; Bryan K; Everatt J; Collins R
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2005 Mar; 42(3):341-53. PubMed ID: 15708021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.