These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20163365)

  • 1. Comparison of bimanual and micro-coaxial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound.
    Wang Y; Xia Y; Liu X; Zheng D; Luo L; Liu Y
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 20163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endothelial cell loss: Biaxial small-incision torsional phacoemulsification versus biaxial small-incision longitudinal phacoemulsification.
    Gonen T; Sever O; Horozoglu F; Yasar M; Keskinbora KH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1918-24. PubMed ID: 22980723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
    Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of tips in coaxial microincision cataract surgery with the bevel-down technique.
    Kim EK; Jo KJ; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):2028-33. PubMed ID: 21907535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Torsional ultrasound efficiency under different vacuum levels in different degrees of nuclear cataract.
    Wang Y; Xia Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Chen B; Liu Y; Liu Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1941-5. PubMed ID: 19878827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Alió J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A; Ramzy M
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
    Lee KM; Kwon HG; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Piotr L; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
    Crema AS; Walsh A; Yamane Y; Nosé W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification using tips with 30-degree and 45-degree aperture angles.
    Helvacioglu F; Sencan S; Yeter C; Tunc Z; Uyar OM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 24440105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mini-flared Kelman tip, reverse tip, and sidewinder tip with torsional phaco: a prospective randomized comparative study.
    Hida WT; Tzelikis PF; Nakano CT; Motta AF; Alves MR
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2015; 78(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 25714532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of low versus high fluidic settings on the efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification.
    Schriefl SM; Stifter E; Menapace R
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 92(6):e454-7. PubMed ID: 23782595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery.
    Dosso AA; Cottet L; Burgener ND; Di Nardo S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18242455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bimanual microphacoemulsification versus coaxial miniphacoemulsification: prospective study.
    Cavallini GM; Campi L; Masini C; Pelloni S; Pupino A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 17321387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Gabriel P; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phacopower modulation and the risk for postoperative corneal decompensation: a randomized clinical trial.
    Doors M; Berendschot TT; Touwslager W; Webers CA; Nuijts RM
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 131(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 24030086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.