BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20163450)

  • 1. Poor statistical performance of the Mantel test in phylogenetic comparative analyses.
    Harmon LJ; Glor RE
    Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):2173-8. PubMed ID: 20163450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing phylogenetic signal with measurement error: a comparison of Mantel tests, Blomberg et al.'s K, and phylogenetic distograms.
    Hardy OJ; Pavoine S
    Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2614-21. PubMed ID: 22834757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends.
    Laurin M
    Syst Biol; 2010 Dec; 59(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 20937759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic signal in bone microstructure of sauropsids.
    Cubo J; Ponton F; Laurin M; de Margerie E; Castanet J
    Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):562-74. PubMed ID: 16085575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test.
    Martins EP; Diniz-Filho JA; Housworth EA
    Evolution; 2002 Jan; 56(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11913655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of intraspecific sample size on type I and type II error rates in comparative studies.
    Harmon LJ; Losos JB
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2705-10. PubMed ID: 16526516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Euclidean nature of phylogenetic distance matrices.
    de Vienne DM; Aguileta G; Ollier S
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 21804094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for phylogenetic signal in phenotypic traits: new matrices of phylogenetic proximities.
    Pavoine S; Ollier S; Pontier D; Chessel D
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Feb; 73(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 18022657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulation test of Smith's "Degrees of freedom" correction for comparative studies.
    Nunn CL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1995 Nov; 98(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 8572158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phylogenetic targeting of research effort in evolutionary biology.
    Arnold C; Nunn CL
    Am Nat; 2010 Nov; 176(5):601-12. PubMed ID: 20887190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The systematic component of phylogenetic error as a function of taxonomic sampling under parsimony.
    Debry RW
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 16012109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward extracting all phylogenetic information from matrices of evolutionary distances.
    Roch S
    Science; 2010 Mar; 327(5971):1376-9. PubMed ID: 20223986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Independent contrasts and regression through the origin.
    Legendre P; Desdevises Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug; 259(4):727-43. PubMed ID: 19409908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seeking the evolutionary regression coefficient: an analysis of what comparative methods measure.
    Pagel M
    J Theor Biol; 1993 Sep; 164(2):191-205. PubMed ID: 8246516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts.
    Symonds MR
    Syst Biol; 2002 Aug; 51(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 12227998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delayed-response phylogenetic correlation: an optimization-based method to test covariation of continuous characters.
    Giannini NP; Goloboff PA
    Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):1885-98. PubMed ID: 20100217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate.
    Revell LJ; Harmon LJ; Collar DC
    Syst Biol; 2008 Aug; 57(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 18709597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised.
    Felsenstein J
    Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):713-25. PubMed ID: 18419518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing substitution models within a phylogenetic tree.
    Weiss G; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Apr; 20(4):572-8. PubMed ID: 12679552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.