These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20163627)

  • 1. Display of a peer's face picture enhances the preference for a pen in preference testing in cows.
    Ninomiya S; Sato S
    Anim Sci J; 2009 Oct; 80(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 20163627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The motivation of cows to walk as thwarted by tethering.
    Veissier I; Andanson S; Dubroeucq H; Pomiès D
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2723-9. PubMed ID: 18539832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the number of concentrate feeding places per pen on performance, behavior, and welfare indicators of Friesian calves during the first month after arrival at the feedlot.
    González LA; Ferret A; Manteca X; Ruíz-de-la-Torre JL; Calsamiglia S; Devant M; Bach A
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):419-31. PubMed ID: 17940151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short communication: Usage of mechanical brushes by lactating dairy cows.
    DeVries TJ; Vankova M; Veira DM; von Keyserlingk MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2241-5. PubMed ID: 17430923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows.
    Tucker CB; Weary DM; Fraser D
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Feb; 86(2):521-9. PubMed ID: 12647958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of 'Five freedoms' environmental enrichment on the welfare of calves reared indoors.
    Ninomiya S; Sato S
    Anim Sci J; 2009 Jun; 80(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 20163647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the effect of presenting a companion's face picture on social isolation stress using saliva sampling in cows.
    Ninomiya S; Sato S
    Anim Sci J; 2011 Dec; 82(6):787-91. PubMed ID: 22111636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between floor type and behaviour, skin lesions, and claw dimensions in group-housed fattening bulls.
    Platz S; Ahrens F; Bahrs E; Nüske S; Erhard MH
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Jul; 80(2-3):209-21. PubMed ID: 17383035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and analysis of pen studies in the animal sciences.
    St-Pierre NR
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jun; 90 Suppl 1():E87-99. PubMed ID: 17517755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short communication: use of a mechanical brush by Holstein dairy cattle around parturition.
    Newby NC; Duffield TF; Pearl DL; Leslie KE; LeBlanc SJ; von Keyserlingk MAG
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 23462171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of sight barriers in pens of breeding ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus): I. Behaviour and welfare.
    Deeming DC; Hodges HR; Cooper JJ
    Br Poult Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 21919567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance, behavior, and welfare of Friesian heifers housed in pens with two, four, and eight individuals per concentrate feeding place.
    González LA; Ferret A; Manteca X; Ruíz-de-la-Torre JL; Calsamiglia S; Devant M; Bach A
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jun; 86(6):1446-58. PubMed ID: 18272856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brisket boards reduce freestall use.
    Tucker CB; Zdanowicz G; Weary DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jul; 89(7):2603-7. PubMed ID: 16772580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a mechanical grooming brush on the behavior and health of recently weaned heifer calves.
    Velasquez-Munoz A; Manriquez D; Paudyal S; Solano G; Han H; Callan R; Velez J; Pinedo P
    BMC Vet Res; 2019 Aug; 15(1):284. PubMed ID: 31395062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative importance of factors influencing the prevalence of lameness in Austrian cubicle loose-housed dairy cows.
    Rouha-Mülleder C; Iben C; Wagner E; Laaha G; Troxler J; Waiblinger S
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Nov; 92(1-2):123-33. PubMed ID: 19682757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: body condition, skin lesions, and performance.
    Salak-Johnson JL; Niekamp SR; Rodriguez-Zas SL; Ellis M; Curtis SE
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1758-69. PubMed ID: 17371790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of late introduction of sows to two farrowing environments on the progress of farrowing and maternal behavior.
    Pedersen LJ; Jensen T
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2730-7. PubMed ID: 18469055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of number of cows in estrus and confinement area on estrous behavior of beef cows.
    Floyd LN; Lents CA; White FJ; Wettemann RP
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 19251929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preference for bedding material in Syrian hamsters.
    Lanteigne M; Reebs SG
    Lab Anim; 2006 Oct; 40(4):410-8. PubMed ID: 17018212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the preference to and behavioral effects of an enriched environment on male rhesus monkeys.
    Bayne KA; Hurst JK; Dexter SL
    Lab Anim Sci; 1992 Feb; 42(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 1316507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.