These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20163806)

  • 1. Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing.
    Choi Y; Trueswell JC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 May; 106(1):41-61. PubMed ID: 20163806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Referential context and executive functioning influence children's resolution of syntactic ambiguity.
    Qi Z; Love J; Fisher C; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1922-1947. PubMed ID: 32584080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On-line processing of English which-questions by children and adults: a visual world paradigm study.
    Contemori C; Carlson M; Marinis T
    J Child Lang; 2018 Mar; 45(2):415-441. PubMed ID: 28738910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Taking your own path: Individual differences in executive function and language processing skills in child learners.
    Woodard K; Pozzan L; Trueswell JC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jan; 141():187-209. PubMed ID: 26454180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The developing constraints on parsing decisions: the role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing.
    Snedeker J; Trueswell JC
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 Nov; 49(3):238-99. PubMed ID: 15342261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental parsing and linguistic knowledge: Reexamining the role of cognitive control in the kindergarten path effect.
    Huang YT; Hollister E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Aug; 184():210-219. PubMed ID: 31040025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. German-speaking children use sentence-initial case marking for predictive language processing at age four.
    Özge D; Kornfilt J; Maquate K; Küntay AC; Snedeker J
    Cognition; 2022 Apr; 221():104988. PubMed ID: 34953270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing incrementality in filler-gap dependency processing.
    Atkinson E; Wagers MW; Lidz J; Phillips C; Omaki A
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():132-149. PubMed ID: 29936344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toddlers exploit referential and syntactic cues to flexibly adapt their interpretation of novel verb meanings.
    de Carvalho A; Dautriche I; Fiévet AC; Christophe A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Mar; 203():105017. PubMed ID: 33238226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prosodic phrasing in the presence of unambiguous verb information--ERP evidence from German.
    Augurzky P; Kotchoubey B
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 81():31-49. PubMed ID: 26656565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Brothers T; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ
    Biling (Camb Engl); 2021 Aug; 24(4):612-627. PubMed ID: 35669170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language comprehension.
    Özge D; Küntay A; Snedeker J
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():152-180. PubMed ID: 30468979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. English-speaking preschoolers can use phrasal prosody for syntactic parsing.
    de Carvalho A; Lidz J; Tieu L; Bleam T; Christophe A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):EL216. PubMed ID: 27369175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: factors affecting children's syntactic choices in production and comprehension.
    Hurewitz F; Brown-Schmidt S; Thorpe K; Gleitman LR; Trueswell JC
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2000 Nov; 29(6):597-626. PubMed ID: 11196065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preschool children's interpretation of object-initial sentences: neural correlates of their behavioral performance.
    Schipke CS; Knoll LJ; Friederici AD; Oberecker R
    Dev Sci; 2012 Nov; 15(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 23106730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental changes in misinterpretation of garden-path wh-questions in French.
    Lassotta R; Omaki A; Franck J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):829-54. PubMed ID: 26052979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What Eye Movement Reveals Concerning Age-Related Dissociation in Syntactic Prediction: Evidence From a Verb-Final Language.
    Oh SJ; Sung JE; Lee SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jun; 65(6):2235-2257. PubMed ID: 35476960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.