BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20164100)

  • 1. Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in population and individual niche width.
    Bolnick DI; Ingram T; Stutz WE; Snowberg LK; Lau OL; Paull JS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Jun; 277(1689):1789-97. PubMed ID: 20164100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determinants of individual foraging specialization in large marine vertebrates, the Antarctic and subantarctic fur seals.
    Kernaléguen L; Arnould JP; Guinet C; Cherel Y
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jul; 84(4):1081-91. PubMed ID: 25649011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population.
    Svanbäck R; Bolnick DI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 274(1611):839-44. PubMed ID: 17251094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetric competition drives lake use of coexisting salmonids.
    Jonsson B; Jonsson N; Hindar K; Northcote TG; Engen S
    Oecologia; 2008 Oct; 157(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 18629544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Niche overlap in rodents increases with competition but not ecological opportunity: A role of inter-individual difference.
    Shaner PL; Ke LH
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Aug; 91(8):1679-1692. PubMed ID: 35633185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraspecific and interspecific competition induces density-dependent habitat niche shifts in an endangered steppe bird.
    Tarjuelo R; Morales MB; Arroyo B; Mañosa S; Bota G; Casas F; Traba J
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Nov; 7(22):9720-9730. PubMed ID: 29188003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraspecific genetic variation and competition interact to influence niche expansion.
    Agashe D; Bolnick DI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Oct; 277(1696):2915-24. PubMed ID: 20462902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks.
    Bolnick DI
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):608-18. PubMed ID: 15119444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species interactions, environmental gradients and body size shape population niche width.
    Eloranta AP; Finstad AG; Sandlund OT; Knudsen R; Kuparinen A; Amundsen PA
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Jan; 91(1):154-169. PubMed ID: 34657292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraguild predation leads to genetically based character shifts in the threespine stickleback.
    Miller SE; Metcalf D; Schluter D
    Evolution; 2015 Dec; 69(12):3194-203. PubMed ID: 26527484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trophic consequences of introduced species: Comparative impacts of increased interspecific versus intraspecific competitive interactions.
    Britton JR; Ruiz-Navarro A; Verreycken H; Amat-Trigo F
    Funct Ecol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):486-495. PubMed ID: 29576673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population niche width is driven by within-individual niche expansion and individual specialization in introduced brook trout in mountain lakes.
    Baker HK; Bruggeman CEF; Shurin JB
    Oecologia; 2022 Oct; 200(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 35661919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased density of conspecifics caused niche contraction in a multispecific passerine assemblage.
    Barrero A; Traba J; Tarjuelo R
    Ecology; 2024 May; 105(5):e4296. PubMed ID: 38527496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Bolnick DI
    Nature; 2001 Mar; 410(6827):463-6. PubMed ID: 11260712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Niche expansion and the niche variation hypothesis: does the degree of individual variation increase in depauperate assemblages?
    Costa GC; Mesquita DO; Colli GR; Vitt LJ
    Am Nat; 2008 Dec; 172(6):868-77. PubMed ID: 18950275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Network analysis reveals contrasting effects of intraspecific competition on individual vs. population diets.
    Araújo MS; Guimarães PR; Svanbäck R; Pinheiro A; Guimarães P; Dos Reis SF; Bolnick DI
    Ecology; 2008 Jul; 89(7):1981-93. PubMed ID: 18705384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does ecological release from distantly related species affect phenotypic divergence in brook charr?
    Rainville V; Filion A; Lussier I; Pépino M; Magnan P
    Oecologia; 2021 Jan; 195(1):77-92. PubMed ID: 33521849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition and resource breadth shape niche variation and overlap in multiple trophic dimensions.
    Costa-Pereira R; Araújo MS; Souza FL; Ingram T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 May; 286(1902):20190369. PubMed ID: 31039715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drivers of individual niche variation in coexisting species.
    Costa-Pereira R; Rudolf VHW; Souza FL; Araújo MS
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Sep; 87(5):1452-1464. PubMed ID: 29938791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual dietary specialization reduces intraspecific competition, rather than feeding activity, in black amur bream (Megalobrama terminalis).
    Xia Y; Li Y; Zhu S; Li J; Li S; Li X
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17961. PubMed ID: 33087846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.