These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20164107)

  • 1. Determining the number of patient charts necessary for a reliable assessment of practicing family physicians' performance.
    Gagnon R; Jacques A; Billard M; Goulet F
    Eval Health Prof; 2010 Mar; 33(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 20164107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of family physicians' performance using patient charts: interrater reliability and concordance with chart-stimulated recall interview.
    Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Racette P; Sieber W
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):376-92. PubMed ID: 17986671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.
    Lockyer J
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2003; 23(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12739254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician peer assessments for compliance with methadone maintenance treatment guidelines.
    Strike C; Wenghofer E; Gnam W; Hillier W; Veldhuizen S; Millson M
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2007; 27(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 18085599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physician performance assessment: nonequivalence of primary care measures.
    Parkerton PH; Smith DG; Belin TR; Feldbau GA
    Med Care; 2003 Sep; 41(9):1034-47. PubMed ID: 12972843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The prevalence and special educational requirements of dyscompetent physicians.
    Williams BW
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2006; 26(3):173-91. PubMed ID: 16986149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and acceptance of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise as a performance assessment of practicing physicians.
    Sidhu RS; Hatala R; Barron S; Broudo M; Pachev G; Page G
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10 Suppl):S113-5. PubMed ID: 19907370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How do physicians assess their family physician colleagues' performance?: creating a rubric to inform assessment and feedback.
    Sargeant J; Macleod T; Sinclair D; Power M
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2011; 31(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 21671274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consultation competence in general practice: testing the reliability of the Leicester assessment package.
    Fraser RC; McKinley RK; Mulholland H
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):293-6. PubMed ID: 8068374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring physicians' performance in clinical practice: reliability, classification accuracy, and validity.
    Weifeng Weng ; Hess BJ; Lynn LA; Holmboe ES; Lipner RS
    Eval Health Prof; 2010 Sep; 33(3):302-20. PubMed ID: 20801974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defensible assessment of the competency of the practicing physician.
    Cunnington JP; Hanna E; Turnhbull J; Kaigas TB; Norman GR
    Acad Med; 1997 Jan; 72(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 9008561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric properties of a peer-assessment program to assess continuing competence in physical therapy.
    Miller PA; Nayer M; Eva KW
    Phys Ther; 2010 Jul; 90(7):1026-38. PubMed ID: 20430949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulated patient versus clinician marking of doctors' performance: which is more accurate?
    Thistlethwaite J
    Med Educ; 2004 Apr; 38(4):456. PubMed ID: 15025648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in performance: a 5-year longitudinal study of participants in a multi-source feedback programme.
    Violato C; Lockyer JM; Fidler H
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1007-13. PubMed ID: 18823520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance assessment. Family physicians in Montreal meet the mark!
    Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Bourbeau D; Laberge D; Melanson J; Ménard C; Racette P; Rivest R
    Can Fam Physician; 2002 Aug; 48():1337-44. PubMed ID: 12228963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.
    Overeem K; Wollersheim HC; Arah OA; Cruijsberg JK; Grol RP; Lombarts KM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Mar; 12():80. PubMed ID: 22448816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between physician participation in continuing professional development programs and physician in-practice peer assessments.
    Wenghofer EF; Marlow B; Campbell C; Carter L; Kam S; McCauley W; Hill L
    Acad Med; 2014 Jun; 89(6):920-7. PubMed ID: 24871244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review.
    Hall W; Violato C; Lewkonia R; Lockyer J; Fidler H; Toews J; Jennett P; Donoff M; Moores D
    CMAJ; 1999 Jul; 161(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 10420867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning.
    Violato C; Lockyer J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 Aug; 11(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 16832707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
    dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.