These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20164126)

  • 21. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.
    Mullen SR; Martin CA; Ngan P; Gladwin M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 17826603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models.
    Reuschl RP; Heuer W; Stiesch M; Wenzel D; Dittmer MP
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 25724574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Royal London space analysis: plaster versus digital model assessment.
    Grewal B; Lee RT; Zou L; Johal A
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):320-325. PubMed ID: 27511915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mandibular arch form: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy.
    Ronay V; Miner RM; Will LA; Arai K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 18774089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setups.
    Fabels LN; Nijkamp PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 25432262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Traditional plaster casts and dental digital models: intra-examiner reliability of measurements.
    Mangiacapra R; Butti AC; Salvato A; Biagi R
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 20545091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
    Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.
    Koretsi V; Kirschbauer C; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3387-3396. PubMed ID: 30539294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The validity, reliability, and time requirement of study model analysis using cone-beam computed tomography-generated virtual study models.
    Luu NS; Mandich MA; Flores-Mir C; El-Bialy T; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Feb; 17(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 23590668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D; Freer TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
    Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Townsend GC
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study.
    Asquith J; Gillgrass T; Mossey P
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17974542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models.
    Santoro M; Galkin S; Teredesai M; Nicolay OF; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul; 124(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 12867904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An alternative to study model storage.
    Malik OH; Abdi-Oskouei M; Mandall NA
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 19028672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of agreement in measuring orthodontic treatment need with the modified DHC.
    Bagheban AA; Nourit M; Safavi M
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 May; 24(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 18649558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of examiner differences on KIG-classification when assessing malocclusions.
    Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Schröder W; Bernhardt O; Proff P; Bayerlein T; Gedrange T; Kocher T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Mar; 67(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16570130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.