These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2016433)

  • 1. Thresholds for segregating a narrow-band from a broadband noise based on interaural phase and level differences.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Feb; 89(2):838-44. PubMed ID: 2016433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of interaural stimulus uncertainty on binaural signal detection.
    Breebaart J; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):331-45. PubMed ID: 11206162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions.
    Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1889-901. PubMed ID: 1401533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrimination of dynamic interaural intensity differences.
    Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 6747114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monaural and interaural temporal modulation transfer functions measured with 5-kHz carriers.
    Stellmack MA; Viemeister NF; Byrne AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2507-18. PubMed ID: 16266171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
    Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.
    Stillman JA; Irwin RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. II: Influence of frequency and interaural-phase uncertainty.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1749-56. PubMed ID: 2262631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):306-16. PubMed ID: 1737879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-individual differences in binaural detection of low-frequency or high-frequency tonal signals masked by narrow-band or broadband noise.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Hyde EL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2069-78. PubMed ID: 9566329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of interaural delay of the masker on masking-level differences in young and old adults.
    Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2129-35. PubMed ID: 1597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaural level differences and the level-meter model.
    Hartmann WM; Constan ZA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1037-45. PubMed ID: 12243152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probability distributions of interaural phase and level differences in binaural detection stimuli.
    Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1927-32. PubMed ID: 1960286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of randomizing values of interaural disparities on binaural detection and on discrimination of interaural correlation.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Aug; 102(2 Pt 1):1113-20. PubMed ID: 9265758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural forward and backward masking: evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection.
    Kollmeier B; Gilkey RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1709-19. PubMed ID: 2341675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity.
    Chandler DW; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1624-36. PubMed ID: 1564199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.