These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20166077)

  • 1. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam.
    Sharif MO; Merry A; Catleugh M; Tickle M; Brunton P; Dunne SM; Aggarwal VR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Feb; (2):CD005970. PubMed ID: 20166077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite.
    Sharif MO; Catleugh M; Merry A; Tickle M; Dunne SM; Brunton P; Aggarwal VR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Feb; (2):CD005971. PubMed ID: 20166078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam.
    Sharif MO; Merry A; Catleugh M; Tickle M; Brunton P; Dunne SM; Aggarwal VR; Chong LY
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD005970. PubMed ID: 24510713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite.
    Sharif MO; Catleugh M; Merry A; Tickle M; Dunne SM; Brunton P; Aggarwal VR; Chong LY
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD005971. PubMed ID: 24510679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defective amalgam restorations--repair or replace?
    Balevi B
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Jun; 15(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 24971860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defective composite restorations--repair or replace?
    Abt E
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Jun; 15(2):52-3. PubMed ID: 24971859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Agnihotry A; Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3(3):CD007517. PubMed ID: 26954446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of repairing versus replacing composite or amalgam restorations.
    Kanzow P; Wiegand A; Schwendicke F
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():41-47. PubMed ID: 27575986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk of failure of repaired versus replaced defective direct restorations in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mendes LT; Pedrotti D; Casagrande L; Lenzi TL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):4917-4927. PubMed ID: 35362754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repair of restorations--criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations.
    Hickel R; Brüshaver K; Ilie N
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jan; 29(1):28-50. PubMed ID: 22867859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: A systematic review.
    Afrashtehfar KI; Emami E; Ahmadi M; Eilayyan O; Abi-Nader S; Tamimi F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):345-353.e8. PubMed ID: 27765400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root filled teeth.
    Fedorowicz Z; Carter B; de Souza RF; Chaves CA; Nasser M; Sequeira-Byron P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 May; (5):CD009109. PubMed ID: 22592736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Peltz I; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010526. PubMed ID: 27780315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.