These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20166077)

  • 21. Repair versus replacement of defective direct dental restorations: A multinational cross-sectional study with meta-analysis.
    Hatipoğlu Ö; Martins JFB; Karobari MI; Taha N; Aldhelai TA; Ayyad DM; Madfa AA; Martin-Biedma B; Fernandez R; Omarova BA; Yi LW; Alfirjani S; Lehmann A; Sugumaran S; Petridis X; Krmek SJ; Wahjuningrum DA; Iqbal A; Abidin IZ; Intriago MG; Elhamouly Y; Palma PJ; Hatipoğlu FP
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105096. PubMed ID: 38796090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and amalgam in the replacement of amalgam Class II restorations.
    Tobi H; Kreulen CM; Vondeling H; van Amerongen WE
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Apr; 27(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 10226724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Amalgam or composite fillings--which material lasts longer?
    Hurst D
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Jun; 15(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 24971858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No available evidence to assess the effectiveness of bonded amalgams.
    Murad M
    Evid Based Dent; 2009; 10(4):106. PubMed ID: 20023615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta- analysis.
    Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V; Leal SC; Oliveira LB; Bezerra AC; Bönecker M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2009 Mar; 10(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19364244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Placement and replacement rates of amalgam and composite restorations on posterior teeth in a military population.
    Owen BD; Guevara PH; Greenwood W
    US Army Med Dep J; 2017; (2-17):88-94. PubMed ID: 28853125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 16924981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
    Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Moraschini V; Fai CK; Alto RM; Dos Santos GO
    J Dent; 2015 Sep; 43(9):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 26116767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations.
    Eltahlah D; Lynch CD; Chadwick BL; Blum IR; Wilson NHF
    J Dent; 2018 May; 72():1-7. PubMed ID: 29522787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries.
    Pereira-Cenci T; Cenci MS; Fedorowicz Z; Marchesan MA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jul; (3):CD007819. PubMed ID: 19588443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review.
    Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V; Banerjee A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Jun; 14(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 19688227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Operative caries management in adults and children.
    Ricketts D; Lamont T; Innes NP; Kidd E; Clarkson JE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD003808. PubMed ID: 23543523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations.
    Moncada G; Vildósola P; Fernández E; Estay J; de Oliveira Júnior OB; de Andrade MF; Martin J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 25100406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Seal, replacement or monitoring amalgam restorations with occlusal marginal defects? Results of a 10-year clinical trial.
    Moncada G; Fernández E; Mena K; Martin J; Vildósola P; De Oliveira Junior OB; Estay J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1371-8. PubMed ID: 26231302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up.
    Fernández EM; Martin JA; Angel PA; Mjör IA; Gordan VV; Moncada GA
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 21537587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.