146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20166601)
1. Toward a quality guide to facilitate the transference of analytical methods from research to testing laboratories: a case study.
Bisetty K; Gumede NJ; Escuder-Gilabert L; Sagrado S
J AOAC Int; 2009; 92(6):1821-32. PubMed ID: 20166601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Importance of implementing an analytical quality control system in a core laboratory.
Marques-Garcia F; Garcia-Codesal MF; Caro-Narros MR; Contreras-SanFeliciano T
Rev Calid Asist; 2015; 30(6):302-9. PubMed ID: 26547108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of analytical methods and laboratory procedures for chemical measurements.
van Zoonen P; van 't Klooster HA; Hoogerbrugge R; Gort SM; van de Wiel HJ
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 1998 Dec; 49(4):355-70. PubMed ID: 10356848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Activity of the Codex Alimentarius Commission FAO/WHO on quality assurance in the laboratory].
Cwiek-Ludwicka K; Wojciechowska-Mazurek M; Brulińska-ostrowska E; Starska K
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1997; 48(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 9562806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reference materials for quality control of water analysis].
Caroli S
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2005; 41(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 16552123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust, fit-for-purpose method transfer: why we should apply equivalence testing.
Wieling J
Bioanalysis; 2015; 7(7):807-14. PubMed ID: 25932515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Moving Average for Continuous Quality Control: Time to Move to Implementation in Daily Practice?
van Rossum HH; Kemperman H
Clin Chem; 2017 May; 63(5):1041-1043. PubMed ID: 28320760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Proficiency testing for chemical analytical laboratories--general principles concerning organization and assessment of results].
Ludwicki JK; Góralczyk K; Czaja K; Struciński P
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1995; 46(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 8533027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The potential impact of laboratory informatics on technology transfer.
McDowall RD
Bioanalysis; 2015; 7(7):801-6. PubMed ID: 25932514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Present analytical quality in the Nordic clinical chemistry laboratories.
Aronsson T; Bjørnstad P; Leskinen E; Uldall A; De Verdier CH
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1980; 155():11-8. PubMed ID: 6948361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PAT Program report: background and current status. Proficiency Analytical Testing.
Grunder FI; Bell C
AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):900-1. PubMed ID: 11192226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Horwitz ratio (HorRat): A useful index of method performance with respect to precision.
Horwitz W; Albert R
J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(4):1095-109. PubMed ID: 16915851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ASVCP quality assurance guidelines: control of general analytical factors in veterinary laboratories.
Flatland B; Freeman KP; Friedrichs KR; Vap LM; Getzy KM; Evans EW; Harr KE
Vet Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 39(3):264-77. PubMed ID: 21054473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical topics in the laboratory sciences.
Parvin CA
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():353-75. PubMed ID: 18450059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardization in the laboratory.
S Afr Med J; 1970 Mar; 44(12):333. PubMed ID: 5427139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Median of patient results as a tool for assessment of analytical stability.
Jørgensen LM; Hansen SI; Petersen PH; Sölétormos G
Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Jun; 446():186-91. PubMed ID: 25920692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality control for industrial hygiene laboratories.
Paik NW; Levine SP
World Health Forum; 1997; 18(3-4):359-62. PubMed ID: 9478163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Essential criteria for quality systems in medical laboratories.
Jansen RT; Blaton V; Burnett D; Huisman W; Queraltó JM; Zérah S; Allman B
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1997 Feb; 35(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 9056756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in internal standard: an inspector's perspective.
Vinter S
Bioanalysis; 2019 Sep; 11(18):1649-1651. PubMed ID: 31617397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward the Standardization of Biochar Analysis: The COST Action TD1107 Interlaboratory Comparison.
Bachmann HJ; Bucheli TD; Dieguez-Alonso A; Fabbri D; Knicker H; Schmidt HP; Ulbricht A; Becker R; Buscaroli A; Buerge D; Cross A; Dickinson D; Enders A; Esteves VI; Evangelou MW; Fellet G; Friedrich K; Gasco Guerrero G; Glaser B; Hanke UM; Hanley K; Hilber I; Kalderis D; Leifeld J; Masek O; Mumme J; Carmona MP; Calvelo Pereira R; Rees F; Rombolà AG; de la Rosa JM; Sakrabani R; Sohi S; Soja G; Valagussa M; Verheijen F; Zehetner F
J Agric Food Chem; 2016 Jan; 64(2):513-27. PubMed ID: 26693953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
