These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20167406)
61. Preference of Older Adults for Flexibility in Service and Providers in Community-Based Social Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Wang K; Wong EL; Wong AY; Cheung AW; Yeoh EK Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35055508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Patients' preferences in anticoagulant therapy: discrete choice experiment. Najafzadeh M; Gagne JJ; Choudhry NK; Polinski JM; Avorn J; Schneeweiss SS Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 Nov; 7(6):912-9. PubMed ID: 25387782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Patient preferences for management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment. Fletcher B; Hinton L; McManus R; Rivero-Arias O Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Sep; 69(686):e629-e637. PubMed ID: 31405832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Practitioners preferences of care coordination for older people: A discrete choice experiment. Jasper R; Chester H; Hughes J; Abendstern M; Loynes N; Sutcliffe C; Davies L; Challis D J Gerontol Soc Work; 2018; 61(2):151-170. PubMed ID: 29252115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Hospital service quality - patient preferences - a discrete choice experiment. Bahrampour M; Bahrampour A; Amiresmaili M; Barouni M Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Aug; 31(7):676-683. PubMed ID: 30354878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Measuring Preferences for a Diabetes Pay-for-Performance for Patient (P4P4P) Program using a Discrete Choice Experiment. Chen TT; Tung TH; Hsueh YS; Tsai MH; Liang HM; Li KL; Chung KP; Tang CH Value Health; 2015 Jul; 18(5):578-86. PubMed ID: 26297085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Preferences for physician services in Ukraine: a discrete choice experiment. Danyliv A; Pavlova M; Gryga I; Groot W Int J Health Plann Manage; 2015; 30(4):346-65. PubMed ID: 24399636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Effects of strategic behavior and public subsidies on families' savings and long-term care decisions. Sloan FA; Hoerger TJ; Picone G Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 1996; 5():45-78. PubMed ID: 10164423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. [Long-Term Care Preferences Among Individuals of Advanced Age in Germany: Results of a Population-Based Study]. Hajek A; Lehnert T; Wegener A; Riedel-Heller SG; König HH Gesundheitswesen; 2018 Aug; 80(8-09):685-692. PubMed ID: 28268234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Preferences for Early Intervention Mental Health Services: A Discrete-Choice Conjoint Experiment. Becker MP; Christensen BK; Cunningham CE; Furimsky I; Rimas H; Wilson F; Jeffs L; Bieling PJ; Madsen V; Chen YY; Mielko S; Zipursky RB Psychiatr Serv; 2016 Feb; 67(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 26369880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Models for delivering long term care. Lubben JE Home Health Care Serv Q; 1987; 8(2):5-22. PubMed ID: 10312326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports. Abbott KM; Klumpp R; Leser KA; Straker JK; Gannod GC; Van Haitsma K J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2018 Feb; 19(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 29146223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Elderly community residents' evaluative criteria and preferences for formal and informal in-home services. Wielink G; Huijsman R Int J Aging Hum Dev; 1999; 48(1):17-33. PubMed ID: 10363558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Using local knowledge to model asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay for environmental services. Glenk K J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):531-41. PubMed ID: 20934801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Determinants of received long-term care - Individual responses to regional nursing home provisions. Pilny A; Stroka MA Health Care Manag Sci; 2016 Dec; 19(4):326-337. PubMed ID: 26163809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Does responsibility affect the public's valuation of health care interventions? A relative valuation approach to health care safety. Singh J; Lord J; Longworth L; Orr S; McGarry T; Sheldon R; Buxton M Value Health; 2012; 15(5):690-8. PubMed ID: 22867778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Long-term care policy for the elderly in the Zaporozhye region of Ukraine: a case study of social development following the collapse of Communism. Palley HA; Romanenkova LA J Aging Soc Policy; 2004; 16(3):71-91. PubMed ID: 15374813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Saving lives versus life-years in rural Bangladesh: an ethical preferences approach. Johansson-Stenman O; Mahmud M; Martinsson P Health Econ; 2011 Jun; 20(6):723-36. PubMed ID: 20575149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences in health care. Pfarr C; Schmid A; Schneider U Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 2014; 12():27-48. PubMed ID: 24864381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Patient Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Zambia: Protocol for a Multi-Cohort Discrete Choice Experiment. Subramanian S; Kaganova Y; Zhang Y; Hoover S; Nyambe N; Pinder L; Chibwesha C; Kapambwe S; Parham G JMIR Res Protoc; 2018 Jul; 7(7):e10429. PubMed ID: 30045833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]