168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20167413)
1. Deconstructing the tower: parameters and predictors of problem difficulty on the Tower of London task.
Berg WK; Byrd DL; McNamara JP; Case K
Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 20167413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Tower of London: a study of the effect of problem structure on planning.
Newman SD; Pittman G
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Apr; 29(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 17454353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An fMRI study of the Tower of London: a look at problem structure differences.
Newman SD; Greco JA; Lee D
Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1286():123-32. PubMed ID: 19540214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is in a name: comparing the Tower of London with one of its variants.
Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Halsband U; Kaller CP
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):418-28. PubMed ID: 15820648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task.
Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Halsband U
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 15268923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing planning ability with the Tower of London task: psychometric properties of a structurally balanced problem set.
Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM; Stahl C
Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21859218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Planning abilities and the Tower of London: is this task measuring a discrete cognitive function?
Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Kaller CP; Leonhart R; Quiske K; Hoppe-Seyler K; Meier C; Müller C; Halsband U
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 26(6):846-56. PubMed ID: 15370380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reviewing the impact of problem structure on planning: a software tool for analyzing tower tasks.
Kaller CP; Rahm B; Köstering L; Unterrainer JM
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20723568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceived conflicts and errors in complex problem solving.
Unterrainer JM; Rauss KS; Kaller CP; Leonhart R; Rahm B
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Oct; 30(7):816-27. PubMed ID: 18608695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Planning in Parkinson's disease: a matter of problem structure?
McKinlay A; Kaller CP; Grace RC; Dalrymple-Alford JC; Anderson TJ; Fink J; Roger D
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):384-9. PubMed ID: 17928014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of performance on the Towers of London and Hanoi in young children.
Bull R; Espy KA; Senn TE
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 May; 45(4):743-54. PubMed ID: 15056306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Tower of London spatial problem-solving task: enhancing clinical and research implementation.
Keith Berg W; Byrd D
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 Aug; 24(5):586-604. PubMed ID: 12187443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Counterintuitive and alternative moves choice in the Water Jug task.
Carder HP; Handley SJ; Perfect TJ
Brain Cogn; 2008 Feb; 66(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 17555858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of frontal lobe lesions on goal achievement in the water jug task.
Colvin MK; Dunbar K; Grafman J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 13(8):1129-47. PubMed ID: 11784450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deconstructing the Tower of London: alternative moves and conflict resolution as predictors of task performance.
Carder H; Handley S; Perfect T
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Nov; 57(8):1459-83. PubMed ID: 15513255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mental planning and the Tower of London task.
Phillips LH; Wynn VE; McPherson S; Gilhooly KJ
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 May; 54(2):579-97. PubMed ID: 11394063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of planning ability: Psychometric analyses on the unidimensionality and construct validity of the Tower of London Task (TOL-F).
Debelak R; Egle J; Köstering L; Kaller CP
Neuropsychology; 2016 Mar; 30(3):346-360. PubMed ID: 26523519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Tower of London and neuropsychological assessment of ADHD in adults.
Riccio CA; Wolfe ME; Romine C; Davis B; Sullivan JR
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Aug; 19(5):661-71. PubMed ID: 15271410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual differences in cognitive planning on the Tower of Hanoi task: neuropsychological maturity or measurement error?
Bishop DV; Aamodt-Leeper G; Creswell C; McGurk R; Skuse DH
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2001 May; 42(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 11383971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Planning abilities and chess: a comparison of chess and non-chess players on the Tower of London task.
Unterrainer JM; Kaller CP; Halsband U; Rahm B
Br J Psychol; 2006 Aug; 97(Pt 3):299-311. PubMed ID: 16848944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
