941 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20168127)
1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease.
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1156-1158. PubMed ID: 20168127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining Optimal Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: Clinical Decision Tree Algorithm.
Schmitt JJ; Carranza Leon DA; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; Dowdy SC; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Pasupathy KS; Gebhart JB
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 129(1):130-138. PubMed ID: 27926638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing Utilization of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
Walters MD; Ridgeway BM
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 60(2):273-285. PubMed ID: 28263200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.
Tapper AM; Hannola M; Zeitlin R; Isojärvi J; Sintonen H; Ikonen TS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():1-10. PubMed ID: 24703710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach.
Kovac SR
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 57(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 24351441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic assistance after vaginal hysterectomy and unsuccessful access to the ovaries or failed uterine mobilization: changing trends.
Sizzi O; Paparella P; Bonito C; Paparella R; Rossetti A
JSLS; 2004; 8(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 15554277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review.
Krizova A; Clarke BA; Bernardini MQ; James S; Kalloger SE; Boerner SL; Mulligan AM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21164295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches.
Landeen LB; Bell MC; Hubert HB; Bennis LY; Knutsen-Larson SS; Seshadri-Kreaden U
S D Med; 2011 Jun; 64(6):197-9, 201, 203 passim. PubMed ID: 21710804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Rational laparoscopic intervention in laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH): prospective study].
Kuzel D; Fucíková Z; Cibula D; Tóth D; Zivný J
Ceska Gynekol; 1999 Apr; 64(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 10510549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.
Kovac SR
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7800317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital.
Johns DA; Carrera B; Jones J; DeLeon F; Vincent R; Safely C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1709-15; discussion 1715-9. PubMed ID: 7778623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Shepherd JP; Kantartzis KL; Ahn KH; Bonidie MJ; Lee T
JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total hysterectomy for a nonprolapsed, benign uterus in women without vaginal deliveries.
Chauveaud A; de Tayrac R; Gervaise A; Anquetil C; Fernandez H
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 11838309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Paraiso MF
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
Fylstra DL; Carter JF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy: a statistical model for determining physician decision making and patient outcome.
Kovac SR; Christie SJ; Bindbeutel GA
Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 2034070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
