These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China. Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting. Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical utility of the Braden scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Braden BJ; Bergstrom N Decubitus; 1989 Aug; 2(3):44-6, 50-1. PubMed ID: 2775473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluating the risks of pressure ulcers. The Braden scale]. Torra i Bou JE Rev Enferm; 1997 Apr; 20(224):22-30. PubMed ID: 9220862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes. Kottner J; Dassen T Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A critique of 'at risk' pressure sore assessment tools. Smith LN; Booth N; Douglas D; Robertson WR; Walker A; Durie M; Fraser A; Hillan EH; Swaffield J J Clin Nurs; 1995 May; 4(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 7773524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Braden Scale and clinical judgment. Bergstrom N J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):133-4. PubMed ID: 8347761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Bergstrom N; Demuth PJ; Braden BJ Nurs Clin North Am; 1987 Jun; 22(2):417-28. PubMed ID: 3554150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting. Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Construct validity of Minimum Data Set items within the context of the Braden Conceptual Schema. Zulkowski K Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Oct; 44(10):36-40, 42-4, 46-7. PubMed ID: 9866595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population. Feuchtinger J; Halfens R; Dassen T Nurs Crit Care; 2007; 12(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17883663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]