These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2016817)
21. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Steiner MS Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients. Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle. Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Lowe FC J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 3656538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients. Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Men with low preoperative sexual function may benefit from nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Harris CR; Punnen S; Carroll PR J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):981-6. PubMed ID: 23410984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Clinical analysis of radical retropubic prostatectomy: a report of 132 cases]. Huang YR; Wang YT; Xue W; Liu DM; Zhou LX Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 44(6):365-8. PubMed ID: 16638341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Nerve-sparing Surgery Technique, Not the Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles, Leads to Improved Long-term Continence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy. Michl U; Tennstedt P; Feldmeier L; Mandel P; Oh SJ; Ahyai S; Budäus L; Chun FKH; Haese A; Heinzer H; Salomon G; Schlomm T; Steuber T; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):584-589. PubMed ID: 26277303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program. Varkarakis J; Pinggera GM; Sebe P; Berger A; Bartsch G; Horninger W Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 14972485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of outcomes and complications between antegrade and retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy]. Xiong ZB; Shi M; Kunwar A; Chen N; Zhang P; Zeng H; Li X Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Jan; 43(1):95-8, 103. PubMed ID: 22455141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update. Walz J; Epstein JI; Ganzer R; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Kaouk J; Menon M; Mottrie A; Myers RP; Patel V; Tewari A; Villers A; Artibani W Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 26850969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy--effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Stolzenburg JU; Liatsikos EN; Rabenalt R; Do M; Sakelaropoulos G; Horn LC; Truss MC Eur Urol; 2006 Jan; 49(1):103-11; discussion 111-2. PubMed ID: 16314031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Talcott JA; Rieker P; Propert KJ; Clark JA; Wishnow KI; Loughlin KR; Richie JP; Kantoff PW J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Aug; 89(15):1117-23. PubMed ID: 9262249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Effect of Nerve Sparing Status on Sexual and Urinary Function: 3-Year Results from the CEASAR Study. Avulova S; Zhao Z; Lee D; Huang LC; Koyama T; Hoffman KE; Conwill RM; Wu XC; Chen V; Cooperberg MR; Goodman M; Greenfield S; Hamilton AS; Hashibe M; Paddock LE; Stroup A; Resnick MJ; Penson DF; Barocas DA J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1202-1209. PubMed ID: 29253578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Veil nerve-sparing technique and postoperative urinary continence in open antegrade radical prostatectomy. Shigemura K; Yamanaka N; Yamashita M Urol Int; 2012; 89(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 22868268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy using high anterior release of the levator fascia and constant haptic feedback in bilateral neurovascular bundle preservation plus early postoperative phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition: a contemporary series. Hubanks JM; Umbreit EC; Karnes RJ; Myers RP Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):878-84. PubMed ID: 22154730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy with preservation of potency. Results using a new nerve-sparing technique. Walsh PC; Mostwin JL Br J Urol; 1984 Dec; 56(6):694-7. PubMed ID: 6534493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]