472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20168262)
21. 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques.
Koolen BB; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Aukema TS; Vogel WV; Oldenburg HS; van der Hage JA; Hoefnagel CA; Stokkel MP; Loo CE; Rodenhuis S; Rutgers EJ; Valdés Olmos RA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 21935602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characteristics of primary papillary thyroid carcinoma with false-negative findings on initial (18)F-FDG PET/CT.
Choi JW; Yoon YH; Yoon YH; Kim SM; Koo BS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21140231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-effectiveness of adding FDG-PET or CT to the diagnostic work-up of patients with stage III melanoma.
Bastiaannet E; Uyl-de Groot CA; Brouwers AH; van der Jagt EJ; Hoekstra OS; Oyen W; Verzijlbergen F; van Ooijen B; Thompson JF; Hoekstra HJ
Ann Surg; 2012 Apr; 255(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 22367443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to diagnose recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA concentrations.
Kyoto Y; Momose M; Kondo C; Itabashi M; Kameoka S; Kusakabe K
Ann Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 24(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 20364373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Postoperative FDG-PET/CT staging in GIST: is there a benefit following R0 resection?
Hahn S; Bauer S; Heusner TA; Ebeling P; Hamami ME; Stahl A; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):670-4. PubMed ID: 20970938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interest of (18)F-FDG PET-CT scanning for staging and management of merkel cell carcinoma: a retrospective study of 15 patients.
Maury G; Dereure O; Du-Thanh A; Mariano-Goulart D; Guillot B
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1420-7. PubMed ID: 21366705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI.
Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Takahashi S; Ebina Y; Miyahara Y; Yamada H; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1672-6. PubMed ID: 23727380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Routine FDG PET-CT in patients with a high-risk localized melanoma has a high predictive positive value for nodal disease and high negative predictive value for the presence of distant metastases.
Wagner T; Chevreau C; Meyer N; Mourey L; Courbon F; Zerdoud S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1431-5. PubMed ID: 22017492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Role of the integrated FDG PET/CT in the surgical management of patients with high risk clinical early stage endometrial cancer: detection of pelvic nodal metastases.
Signorelli M; Guerra L; Buda A; Picchio M; Mangili G; Dell'Anna T; Sironi S; Messa C
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Nov; 115(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 19695685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incremental value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in therapeutic decision-making of potentially curable esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Purandare NC; Pramesh CS; Karimundackal G; Jiwnani S; Agrawal A; Shah S; Kulkarni M; Laskar SG; Rangarajan V
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Aug; 35(8):864-9. PubMed ID: 24751701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The importance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, CT and X-rays in detecting primary stage III A lung cancer and the incidence of extra thoracic metastases.
Sharma R; Tripathi M; D'Souza M; Jaimini A; Saw SK; Singh D; Mishra A; Mondal A
Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 19330177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Sanli Y; Turkmen C; Bakir B; Iyibozkurt C; Ozel S; Has D; Yilmaz E; Topuz S; Yavuz E; Unal SN; Mudun A
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 May; 33(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 22357440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nodal staging of rectal cancer: high-resolution pelvic MRI versus ¹⁸F-FDGPET/CT.
Kim DJ; Kim JH; Ryu YH; Jeon TJ; Yu JS; Chung JJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 21926843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Metabolic Tumor Volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves Preoperative Identification of High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma Patients.
Husby JA; Reitan BC; Biermann M; Trovik J; Bjørge L; Magnussen IJ; Salvesen ØO; Salvesen HB; Haldorsen IS
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 26045311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical staging of patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma: does FDG-PET/CT have a role?
Cuellar SL; Carter BW; Macapinlac HA; Ajani JA; Komaki R; Welsh JW; Lee JH; Swisher SG; Correa AM; Erasmus JJ; Hofstetter WL
J Thorac Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1202-6. PubMed ID: 25157774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Tailoring systematic lymphadenectomy in high-risk clinical early stage endometrial cancer: the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Crivellaro C; Signorelli M; Guerra L; De Ponti E; Pirovano C; Fruscio R; Elisei F; Montanelli L; Buda A; Messa C
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Aug; 130(2):306-11. PubMed ID: 23707673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Whole-body
Gajjala SR; Hulikal N; Kadiyala S; Kottu R; Kalawat T
Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Incremental benefits of FDG positron emission tomography over CT alone for the preoperative staging of ovarian cancer.
Yoshida Y; Kurokawa T; Kawahara K; Tsuchida T; Okazawa H; Fujibayashi Y; Yonekura Y; Kotsuji F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 14684544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical value of FDG-PET for preoperative evaluation of endometrial cancer.
Suga T; Nakamoto Y; Saga T; Higashi T; Hamanaka Y; Tatsumi M; Hayashida K; Hara T; Konishi I; Fujii S; Togashi K
Ann Nucl Med; 2011 May; 25(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 21547477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Additional value of F-18 FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes.
Jeong YJ; Kang DY; Yoon HJ; Son HJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 May; 145(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 24682676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
