These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20169463)

  • 1. Lossy JPEG compression in quantitative angiography: the role of X-ray quantum noise.
    Fritsch JP; Brennecke R
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Jun; 24(3):516-27. PubMed ID: 20169463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Qualitative JPEG 2000 compression in digital mammography - evaluation using 480 mammograms of the CDMAM phantom.
    Schreiter NF; Steffen IG; Miller J; Fallenberg E; Poellinger A; Bick U; Diekmann F
    Rofo; 2011 Jul; 183(7):650-7. PubMed ID: 21667423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography.
    Brennecke R; Bürgel U; Rippin G; Post F; Rupprecht HJ; Meyer J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Feb; 17(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11495503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pan-Canadian evaluation of irreversible compression ratios ("lossy" compression) for development of national guidelines.
    Koff D; Bak P; Brownrigg P; Hosseinzadeh D; Khademi A; Kiss A; Lepanto L; Michalak T; Shulman H; Volkening A
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Dec; 22(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 18931879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of JPEG 2000 encoder options: human and model observer detection of variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms.
    Zhang Y; Pham B; Eckstein MP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 May; 23(5):613-32. PubMed ID: 15147014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images.
    Iyriboz TA; Zukoski MJ; Hopper KD; Stagg PL
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10342156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features.
    Baker WA; Hearne SE; Spero LA; Morris KG; Harrington RA; Sketch MH; Behar VS; Kong Y; Peter RH; Bashore TM; Harrison JK; Cusma JT
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1157-64. PubMed ID: 9286944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiolgoy International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography. Joint Photographic Experts Group.
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 35(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 10758988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms.
    Zhang Y; Pham BT; Eckstein MP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Apr; 23(4):459-74. PubMed ID: 15084071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Compression of digital images in radiology - results of a consensus conference].
    Loose R; Braunschweig R; Kotter E; Mildenberger P; Simmler R; Wucherer M
    Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19115165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Swelling archives warrant closer look at compression.
    Schreiber D
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 14603591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements.
    Koning G; Béretta P; Zwart P; Hekking E; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 9306140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lossy JPEG compression: easy to compress, hard to compare.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Skaleric U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 16549431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs.
    Ricke J; Maass P; Lopez Hänninen E; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Stroszczynski C; Schauer W; Boskamp T; Wolf M
    Invest Radiol; 1998 Aug; 33(8):456-63. PubMed ID: 9704285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assessment of DSA, ultrasound and CT digital images compressed with the JPEG protocol.
    Okkalides D; Efremides S
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Sep; 39(9):1407-21. PubMed ID: 15552113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image compression in morphometry studies requiring 21 CFR Part 11 compliance: procedure is key with TIFFs and various JPEG compression strengths.
    Tengowski MW
    Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 15200165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronary angiogram video compression adapted to medical imaging applications.
    Zaid AO; Abdessalem S; Mourali MS; Farhati A; Bouallègue A; Mechmeche R; Olivier C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():410-3. PubMed ID: 19162680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of JPEG and wavelet compression of body CT images for direct digital teleradiologic transmission.
    Kalyanpur A; Neklesa VP; Taylor CR; Daftary AR; Brink JA
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):772-9. PubMed ID: 11110942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography.
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Hekking E; Zwinderman AH; Becker T; Simon R; Reiber JH
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Apr; 21(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 10731406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.