These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20169468)

  • 1. Eye tracking of men's preferences for female breast size and areola pigmentation.
    Dixson BJ; Grimshaw GM; Linklater WL; Dixson AF
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Feb; 40(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 20169468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women.
    Dixson BJ; Grimshaw GM; Linklater WL; Dixson AF
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Feb; 40(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19688590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of Breast Size and Areolar Pigmentation in Perceptions of Women's Sexual Attractiveness, Reproductive Health, Sexual Maturity, Maternal Nurturing Abilities, and Age.
    Dixson BJ; Duncan M; Dixson AF
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1685-95. PubMed ID: 25828990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Men's preferences for women's breast morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea.
    Dixson BJ; Vasey PL; Sagata K; Sibanda N; Linklater WL; Dixson AF
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1271-9. PubMed ID: 20862533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eye fixations indicate men's preference for female breasts or buttocks.
    Dagnino B; Navajas J; Sigman M
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Aug; 41(4):929-37. PubMed ID: 22552704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: a New Zealand-U.S. comparative study.
    Dixson BJ; Dixson AF; Bishop PJ; Parish A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Jun; 39(3):798-806. PubMed ID: 19139985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon.
    Dixson BJ; Dixson AF; Morgan B; Anderson MJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Jun; 36(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 17136587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology.
    Lykins AD; Meana M; Kambe G
    Arch Sex Behav; 2006 Oct; 35(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 17031585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of an explorative empirical study on human mating in Germany: handsome men, not high-status men, succeed in courtship.
    Pashos A; Niemitz C
    Anthropol Anz; 2003 Sep; 61(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 14524006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Associations among gender-linked toy preferences, spatial ability, and digit ratio: evidence from eye-tracking analysis.
    Alexander GM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2006 Dec; 35(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 16708283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The two sides of beauty: laterality and the duality of facial attractiveness.
    Franklin RG; Adams RB
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Mar; 72(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19914760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women.
    Israel E; Strassberg DS
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Aug; 38(4):551-8. PubMed ID: 17943432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants.
    Roney JR; Hanson KN; Durante KM; Maestripieri D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Sep; 273(1598):2169-75. PubMed ID: 16901836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex typicality and attractiveness in childhood and adulthood: assessing their relationships from videos.
    Rieger G; Gygax L; Linsenmeier JA; Siler-Knogl A; Moskowitz DA; Bailey JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Feb; 40(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 19588237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in eye-movement patterns between anorexic and control observers when judging body size and attractiveness.
    George HR; Cornelissen PL; Hancock PJ; Kiviniemi VV; Tovée MJ
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):340-54. PubMed ID: 21751993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's bust size and men's courtship solicitation.
    Gueguen N
    Body Image; 2007 Dec; 4(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 18089285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual attention to plain and ornamented human bodies: an eye-tracking study.
    Wohlrab S; Fink B; Pyritz LW; Rahlfs M; Kappeler PM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 2):1337-49. PubMed ID: 17879668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.
    De Filippo CL; Lansing CR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16825884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: an eye-tracking study in men and women.
    Rupp HA; Wallen K
    Horm Behav; 2007 Apr; 51(4):524-33. PubMed ID: 17362952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.