165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20169589)
1. Validation of an incremental motor unit number estimation technique in rabbits.
David WS; Goyal N; Henry FP; Baldassari LE; Redmond RW
Muscle Nerve; 2010 Jun; 41(6):794-9. PubMed ID: 20169589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Added sampling improves reproducibility of multipoint motor unit estimates.
Goyal N; Salameh JS; Baldassari LE; David WS
Muscle Nerve; 2010 Jan; 41(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 19813198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulations of motor unit number estimation techniques.
Major LA; Jones KE
J Neural Eng; 2005 Jun; 2(2):17-34. PubMed ID: 15928409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Motor unit number estimation using high-density surface electromyography.
van Dijk JP; Blok JH; Lapatki BG; van Schaik IN; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 119(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18037342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motor unit action potential topography and its use in motor unit number estimation.
Blok JH; Van Dijk JP; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
Muscle Nerve; 2005 Sep; 32(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 15937880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MUNIX and incremental stimulation MUNE in ALS patients and control subjects.
Furtula J; Johnsen B; Christensen PB; Pugdahl K; Bisgaard C; Christensen MK; Arentsen J; Frydenberg M; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Mar; 124(3):610-8. PubMed ID: 23040293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Size does matter: the influence of motor unit potential size on statistical motor unit number estimates in healthy subjects.
Blok JH; van Dijk JP; Drenthen J; Maathuis EM; Stegeman DF
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 121(10):1772-80. PubMed ID: 20447861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thenar motor unit number estimates using the multiple point stimulation technique: reproducibility studies in ALS patients and normal subjects.
Felice KJ
Muscle Nerve; 1995 Dec; 18(12):1412-6. PubMed ID: 7477064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Within-subject reliability of motor unit number estimates and quantitative motor unit analysis in a distal and proximal upper limb muscle.
Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Doherty TJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):596-603. PubMed ID: 16442341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of statistical motor unit number estimates in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: comparisons between size- and number-weighted modifications.
Kwon O; Lee KW
Muscle Nerve; 2004 Feb; 29(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 14755485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stratifying disease stages with different progression rates determined by electrophysiological tests in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Liu XX; Zhang J; Zheng JY; Zhang S; Xu YS; Kang DX; Fan DS
Muscle Nerve; 2009 Mar; 39(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 19208412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Updating motor unit number estimation (MUNE).
Bromberg MB
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 16996797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motor unit number estimates--from A to Z.
Daube JR
J Neurol Sci; 2006 Mar; 242(1-2):23-35. PubMed ID: 16423366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of multiple point stimulation and incremental stimulation in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis].
Xu YS; Zheng JY; Zhang S; Song HS; Zhang J; Fan DS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 89(43):3051-4. PubMed ID: 20137632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Statistical (Poisson) motor unit number estimation. Methodological aspects and normal results in the extensor digitorum brevis muscle of healthy subjects].
Murga Oporto L; Menéndez-de León C; Bauzano Poley E; Núñez-Castaín MJ
Rev Neurol; 2003 Apr 1-15; 36(7):601-4. PubMed ID: 12666036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian statistical MUNE method.
Henderson RD; Ridall PG; Hutchinson NM; Pettitt AN; McCombe PA
Muscle Nerve; 2007 Aug; 36(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 17487869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motor unit number estimation by decomposition-enhanced spike-triggered averaging: control data, test-retest reliability, and contractile level effects.
Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Doherty TJ
Muscle Nerve; 2004 May; 29(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 15116373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of motor unit number index and multiple point stimulation motor unit number estimation in controls.
Higashihara M; Menon P; van den Bos M; Geevasinga N; Vucic S
Muscle Nerve; 2018 Nov; 58(5):660-664. PubMed ID: 30194855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX): a novel neurophysiological marker for neuromuscular disorders; test-retest reliability in healthy volunteers.
Neuwirth C; Nandedkar S; Stålberg E; Barkhaus PE; Carvalho Md; Furtula J; Dijk JP; Baldinger R; Castro J; Costa J; Otto M; Sandberg A; Weber M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Sep; 122(9):1867-72. PubMed ID: 21396884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-rater reliability of motor unit number estimates and quantitative motor unit analysis in the tibialis anterior muscle.
Boe SG; Dalton BH; Harwood B; Doherty TJ; Rice CL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):947-52. PubMed ID: 19375385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
