These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20169589)

  • 1. Validation of an incremental motor unit number estimation technique in rabbits.
    David WS; Goyal N; Henry FP; Baldassari LE; Redmond RW
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Jun; 41(6):794-9. PubMed ID: 20169589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Added sampling improves reproducibility of multipoint motor unit estimates.
    Goyal N; Salameh JS; Baldassari LE; David WS
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Jan; 41(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 19813198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulations of motor unit number estimation techniques.
    Major LA; Jones KE
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Jun; 2(2):17-34. PubMed ID: 15928409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motor unit number estimation using high-density surface electromyography.
    van Dijk JP; Blok JH; Lapatki BG; van Schaik IN; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 119(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18037342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motor unit action potential topography and its use in motor unit number estimation.
    Blok JH; Van Dijk JP; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Sep; 32(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 15937880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MUNIX and incremental stimulation MUNE in ALS patients and control subjects.
    Furtula J; Johnsen B; Christensen PB; Pugdahl K; Bisgaard C; Christensen MK; Arentsen J; Frydenberg M; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Mar; 124(3):610-8. PubMed ID: 23040293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Size does matter: the influence of motor unit potential size on statistical motor unit number estimates in healthy subjects.
    Blok JH; van Dijk JP; Drenthen J; Maathuis EM; Stegeman DF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 121(10):1772-80. PubMed ID: 20447861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thenar motor unit number estimates using the multiple point stimulation technique: reproducibility studies in ALS patients and normal subjects.
    Felice KJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Dec; 18(12):1412-6. PubMed ID: 7477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Within-subject reliability of motor unit number estimates and quantitative motor unit analysis in a distal and proximal upper limb muscle.
    Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Doherty TJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):596-603. PubMed ID: 16442341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of statistical motor unit number estimates in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: comparisons between size- and number-weighted modifications.
    Kwon O; Lee KW
    Muscle Nerve; 2004 Feb; 29(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 14755485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stratifying disease stages with different progression rates determined by electrophysiological tests in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
    Liu XX; Zhang J; Zheng JY; Zhang S; Xu YS; Kang DX; Fan DS
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Mar; 39(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 19208412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Updating motor unit number estimation (MUNE).
    Bromberg MB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 16996797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motor unit number estimates--from A to Z.
    Daube JR
    J Neurol Sci; 2006 Mar; 242(1-2):23-35. PubMed ID: 16423366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of multiple point stimulation and incremental stimulation in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis].
    Xu YS; Zheng JY; Zhang S; Song HS; Zhang J; Fan DS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 89(43):3051-4. PubMed ID: 20137632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Statistical (Poisson) motor unit number estimation. Methodological aspects and normal results in the extensor digitorum brevis muscle of healthy subjects].
    Murga Oporto L; Menéndez-de León C; Bauzano Poley E; Núñez-Castaín MJ
    Rev Neurol; 2003 Apr 1-15; 36(7):601-4. PubMed ID: 12666036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian statistical MUNE method.
    Henderson RD; Ridall PG; Hutchinson NM; Pettitt AN; McCombe PA
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Aug; 36(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 17487869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motor unit number estimation by decomposition-enhanced spike-triggered averaging: control data, test-retest reliability, and contractile level effects.
    Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Doherty TJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2004 May; 29(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 15116373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of motor unit number index and multiple point stimulation motor unit number estimation in controls.
    Higashihara M; Menon P; van den Bos M; Geevasinga N; Vucic S
    Muscle Nerve; 2018 Nov; 58(5):660-664. PubMed ID: 30194855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX): a novel neurophysiological marker for neuromuscular disorders; test-retest reliability in healthy volunteers.
    Neuwirth C; Nandedkar S; Stålberg E; Barkhaus PE; Carvalho Md; Furtula J; Dijk JP; Baldinger R; Castro J; Costa J; Otto M; Sandberg A; Weber M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Sep; 122(9):1867-72. PubMed ID: 21396884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-rater reliability of motor unit number estimates and quantitative motor unit analysis in the tibialis anterior muscle.
    Boe SG; Dalton BH; Harwood B; Doherty TJ; Rice CL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):947-52. PubMed ID: 19375385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.