These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20169796)
1. Withdrawing treatment at the direct or indirect request of patients or in their best interests: HNEAHS v A; Brightwater CG v Rossiter; and Australian Capital Territory v JT. Faunce T J Law Med; 2009 Dec; 17(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 20169796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in a patient's best interests: Australian judicial deliberations. Willmott L; White B; Smith MK; Wilkinson DJ Med J Aust; 2014 Nov; 201(9):545-7. PubMed ID: 25358584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' decisions to die: the emerging Australian jurisprudence. Freckelton I J Law Med; 2011 Mar; 18(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 21528731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal perspectives on consent in disputes about futile care. Stewart CL Med J Aust; 2013 Mar; 198(4):225-6. PubMed ID: 23451971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tackling medical futility in Texas. Truog RD N Engl J Med; 2007 Jul; 357(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 17611201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tackling medical futility in Texas. Fine RL N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(15):1558-9; author reply 1559. PubMed ID: 17928610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Best interests" and withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from an adult who lacks capacity in the parens patriae jurisdiction. Willmott L; White B; Smith MK J Law Med; 2014 Jun; 21(4):920-41. PubMed ID: 25087370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical inappropriateness review: appropriately performed by a medical committee. Smith ML Health Matrix Clevel; 2008; 18(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 19739567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When atlas shrugs: may the state wash its hands of those in need of life-sustaining medical treatment? O'Callaghan N Health Matrix Clevel; 2008; 18(2):291-372. PubMed ID: 19739570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the baby in the bathwater? A defining moment for the Texas Advance Directives Act review process for medical futility judgments. Flamm AL Health Matrix Clevel; 2008; 18(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 19739566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A right to choose how to live: the Australian common law position on refusals of care. Curnow K J Law Med; 2014 Dec; 22(2):398-414. PubMed ID: 25715540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical futility, patient autonomy, and professional integrity: finding the appropriate balance. Halevy A Health Matrix Clevel; 2008; 18(2):261-90. PubMed ID: 19739569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity. Swidler RN N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. When does life-sustaining treatment become futile? Griffith R Br J Nurs; 2013 May 23-Jun 12; 22(10):590-1. PubMed ID: 23752460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient's rights in receiving or rejecting dialysis care. Riley JB; Pristave RJ Nephrol News Issues; 2001 Aug; 15(9):49-51. PubMed ID: 12099187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking. Fader JF MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]