105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2017044)
1. Exceptions to recognition failure as a function of the encoded association between cue and target.
Bryant DJ
Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 2017044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Item-specific effects in recognition failure: reasons for rejection of the Tulving-Wiseman function.
Lian A; Glass AL; Raanaas RK
Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):692-707. PubMed ID: 9701962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory.
Kormi-Nouri R; Nilsson LG
Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 9701961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Tulving-Wiseman law and the recognition of recallable music.
Gardiner JM; Kaminska Z; Java RI; Clarke EF; Mayer P
Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):632-7. PubMed ID: 2266864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mathematical constraints and the Tulving-Wiseman law: a rejoinder.
Gardiner JM; Nilsson LG
Memory; 1993 Sep; 1(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 7584269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm.
Riefer DM; Batchelder WH
Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):611-30. PubMed ID: 7476247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions.
Gardiner JM; Mäntylä T; Nilsson LG
Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8556534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Encoding specificity: retrieval asymmetry in the recognition failure paradigm.
Bartling CA; Thompson CP
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 Nov; 3(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 915447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The TECO theory and lawful dependency in successive episodic memory tests.
Sikström S
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):693-728. PubMed ID: 10994226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Duaal processes in recognition and in recognition failure.
Richard Hanley J
Mem Cognit; 1984 Nov; 12(6):575-80. PubMed ID: 21287047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognition failure of recallable words and recognizable words.
Wallace WP
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1978 Sep; 4(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 690576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recognition failure and integration.
Arlemalm T; Nilsson LG
Scand J Psychol; 1994 Sep; 35(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 7939489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of test-expectancies and test-sequence orders on the recognition failure of recallable words].
Maezawa K; Kashu K
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1988 Oct; 59(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 3236585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On variability, Simpson's paradox, and the relation between recognition and recall: reply to Tulving and Flexser.
Hintzman DL
Psychol Rev; 1993 Jan; 100(1):143-8; discussion 149-53. PubMed ID: 8426879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Successive tests of pair recognition.
Sikström SP
Memory; 1998 Sep; 6(5):531-54. PubMed ID: 10197162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Word repetitions in sentence recognition.
Murnane K; Shiffrin RM
Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 2017036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intentional and incidental encoding of item and associative information in the directed forgetting procedure.
Hockley WE; Ahmad FN; Nicholson R
Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 26407851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recognition failure and the composite memory trace in CHARM.
Metcalfe J
Psychol Rev; 1991 Oct; 98(4):529-53. PubMed ID: 1961772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.
McCabe DP; Smith AD
Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 16754242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of familiarity in associative recognition of unitized compound word pairs.
Ahmad FN; Hockley WE
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2301-24. PubMed ID: 24873736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
