These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2017044)

  • 21. Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: the importance of associative cueing.
    Nowinski JL; Dismukes KR
    Memory; 2005 Aug; 13(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 16076678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models.
    Ratcliff R; McKoon G; Tindall M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jul; 20(4):763-85. PubMed ID: 8064246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models.
    Kahana MJ; Rizzuto DS; Schneider AR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):933-53. PubMed ID: 16248743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experimental manipulation of prior experience: Effects on item and associative recognition.
    Chalmers KA; Humphreys MS
    Memory; 2003 May; 11(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 12908673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 2796741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Incidental cues and picture/word differences in recall.
    Peeck J; Van Dam G; Uhlenbeck WF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 2):1211-5. PubMed ID: 604900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identifying exceptions in a database of recognition failure studies from 1973 to 1992.
    Nilsson LG; Gardiner JM
    Mem Cognit; 1993 May; 21(3):397-410. PubMed ID: 8316103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recognition memory: a cue and information analysis.
    Humphreys MS; Bain JD
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Nov; 11(6):583-600. PubMed ID: 6669027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.
    Clark SE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 1508049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
    Hourihan KL; Smith AR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, learning, and resonance.
    Grossberg S; Stone G
    Psychol Rev; 1986 Jan; 93(1):46-74. PubMed ID: 3961051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A categorical recall strategy does not explain animacy effects in episodic memory.
    VanArsdall JE; Nairne JS; Pandeirada JN; Cogdill M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):761-771. PubMed ID: 26930264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of cue familiarity during retrieval failure is affected by past versus future orientation.
    Cleary AM
    Memory; 2015; 23(4):590-601. PubMed ID: 24786966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
    Nelson DL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Manipulability impairs association-memory: revisiting effects of incidental motor processing on verbal paired-associates.
    Madan CR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():45-51. PubMed ID: 24686239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates?
    Cho KW; Neely JH; Brennan MK; Vitrano D; Crocco S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1768-1778. PubMed ID: 28394159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Role of Cognitive Load in Intentional Forgetting Using the Think/No-Think Task.
    Noreen S; de Fockert JW
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 28219259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 24548323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.