These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2017085)

  • 1. Dry chemistry pathology in general practice. An assessment of utilisation, perceptions and impact on patient care. Non-Laboratory Pathology Working Party of the National Health Technology Advisory Panel.
    Med J Aust; 1991 Apr; 154(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 2017085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Desk top analysers in general medical practice: how useful are they?
    Leese B; Hutton J
    Med Lab Sci; 1990 Oct; 47(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 2283927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of EML 105 and advantage analysers measuring capillary versus venous whole blood glucose in neonates.
    McNamara PJ; Sharief N
    Acta Paediatr; 2001 Sep; 90(9):1033-41. PubMed ID: 11683192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dry chemistry instruments in primary care. II. Comparison of users with non-users.
    Thue G; Sandberg S
    Fam Pract; 1993 Jun; 10(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 8359602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the use of four desktop analysers in six urban general practices.
    Hobbs FD; Broughton PM; Kenkre JE; Thorpe GH; Batki A
    Br J Gen Pract; 1992 Aug; 42(361):317-21. PubMed ID: 1457151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of desk-top cholesterol analysers in general practice.
    Summerton AM; Summerton N
    Public Health; 1995 Sep; 109(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 7480601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bedside determination of clinical-chemical quantities using dry chemistry in an emergency admission].
    Behr W; Barnert J; Wienbeck M
    Med Klin (Munich); 1991 Dec; 86(12):613-6, 660. PubMed ID: 1770902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. General practice pathology. A field trial of the Seralyzer.
    Lamont J
    Aust Fam Physician; 1988 Jul; 17(7):547-8. PubMed ID: 3415570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytical performance, agreement and user-friendliness of six point-of-care testing urine analysers for urinary tract infection in general practice.
    Schot MJ; van Delft S; Kooijman-Buiting AM; de Wit NJ; Hopstaken RM
    BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e006857. PubMed ID: 25986635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of near patient testing in primary care.
    Hobbs FD; Delaney BC; Fitzmaurice DA; Wilson S; Hyde CJ; Thorpe GH; Earl-Slater AS; Jowett S; Tobias RS
    Health Technol Assess; 1997; 1(5):i-iv, 1-229. PubMed ID: 9483154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dry chemistry instruments in primary care. I. Operating conditions and financial considerations.
    Thue G; Sandberg S; Bratberg E; Risa AE; Olsen TE
    Fam Pract; 1993 Jun; 10(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 8359601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the creatinine assay on the Reflotron analyser under centralized and non-centralized conditions.
    Dols JL; Sanders GT
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Jun; 31(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 8369363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computer model in the selection of multiple channel analysers.
    Taylor HW
    Clin Biochem; 1978 Jun; 11(3):87-9. PubMed ID: 688599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of haemoglobin assessments by HemoCue and two automated haematology analysers in young Laotian children.
    Hinnouho GM; Barffour MA; Wessells KR; Brown KH; Kounnavong S; Chanhthavong B; Ratsavong K; Kewcharoenwong C; Hess SY
    J Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):532-538. PubMed ID: 29197856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can the blood gas analyser results be believed? A prospective multicentre study comparing haemoglobin, sodium and potassium measurements by blood gas analysers and laboratory auto-analysers.
    Triplett KE; Wibrow BA; Norman R; Hince DA; Hardy LE; Tan S; Ho KM; Anstey MH
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2019 Mar; 47(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 31070468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician office analyzers. Do they satisfy medically useful criteria for analytical performance of laboratory tests?
    Nanji AA; Poon R; Hinberg I
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Jul; 112(7):757-9. PubMed ID: 3382331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of a desk-top analyser on the number of laboratory tests used in daily general practice. A randomized controlled trial.
    Gilio C; Buntinx F; De Kezel O; Scheys I
    Fam Pract; 1993 Jun; 10(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 8359600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Desktop analysers: quality of results obtained by medical office personnel.
    Nanji AA; Poon R; Hinberg I
    CMAJ; 1988 Mar; 138(6):517-20. PubMed ID: 3345476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.
    Shephard MD; Mazzachi BC; Watkinson L; Shephard AK; Laurence C; Gialamas A; Bubner T
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring blood cholesterol outside the pathology laboratory: issues of accuracy and reliability.
    Reid CM; Jennings GL; Leonard RF; Conyers RA
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Jun; 15(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1842211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.