These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2017085)

  • 21. Bias in feline plasma biochemistry results between three in-house analysers and a commercial laboratory analyser: results should not be directly compared.
    Baral RM; Dhand NK; Morton JM; Krockenberger MB; Govendir M
    J Feline Med Surg; 2015 Aug; 17(8):653-66. PubMed ID: 25297372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessments of feline plasma biochemistry reference intervals for three in-house analysers and a commercial laboratory analyser.
    Baral RM; Dhand NK; Krockenberger MB; Govendir M
    J Feline Med Surg; 2015 Aug; 17(8):667-79. PubMed ID: 25146362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation and use of a dry chemistry analyser in Antarctica.
    Kibby J; Sullivan P
    Int J Circumpolar Health; 1997 Oct; 56(4):142-51. PubMed ID: 9494302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].
    Jaussent S; Labarère J; Boyer JP; François P
    Encephale; 2004; 30(5):437-46. PubMed ID: 15627048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality assessment of blood glucose testing in general practitioners' offices improves quality.
    Stahl M; Brandslund I; Iversen S; Filtenborg JA
    Clin Chem; 1997 Oct; 43(10):1926-31. PubMed ID: 9342014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Calibration of Technicon Chem 1 multitest analysers.
    van Suijlen JD; Blijenberg BG; Boerma GJ; Leijnse B
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1991 Mar; 29(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 2070018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analytical systems ranked by freedom from interferences.
    Glick MR; Ryder KW
    Clin Chem; 1987 Aug; 33(8):1453-8. PubMed ID: 3608165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of imprecision, bias and total error of clinical chemistry analysers.
    Biswas SS; Bindra M; Jain V; Gokhale P
    Indian J Clin Biochem; 2015 Jan; 30(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 25646050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy and precision of the TAS analyser for near-patient INR testing by non-pathology staff in the community.
    Cachia PG; McGregor E; Adlakha S; Davey P; Goudie BM
    J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jan; 51(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 9577376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the use of a dry chemistry analyser in primary care in Norway and the United Kingdom.
    Thue G; Sandberg S; Bullock DG
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Jan; 43(366):10-4. PubMed ID: 8457356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Survey of office laboratory tests in general practice.
    Thue G; Sandberg S
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 1994 Jun; 12(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 7973197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic analysers in clinical biochemistry.
    Rocks BF; Riley C
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1986 Feb; 7(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 3514083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unacceptable potassium measurements.
    Gregory L; Duh SH; Koch T
    J Fam Pract; 1991 May; 32(5):453-4. PubMed ID: 2022929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The History of the AutoChemist®: From Vision to Reality.
    Peterson HE; Jungner I
    Yearb Med Inform; 2014 May; 9(1):235-43. PubMed ID: 24853033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An evaluation of the Olympus "Quickrate" analyser.
    Williams DG; Wood RJ; Worth HG
    Clin Biochem; 1979 Feb; 12(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 445789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the Olympus AU 400 clinical chemistry analyzer.
    Bilić A; Alpeza I; Rukavina AS
    Clin Lab; 2000; 46(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10745974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlates of expected satisfaction with electronic health records in office practices by practitioners.
    Zandieh SO; Yoon-Flannery K; Kuperman GJ; Hyman D; Kaushal R
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():1190. PubMed ID: 18998904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of ACT point-of-care measurements: repeatability and agreement.
    Bosch YP; Ganushchak YM; de Jong DS
    Perfusion; 2006 Jan; 21(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16485696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a laboratory system intended for use in physicians' offices. I. Reliability of results produced by trained laboratory technologists.
    Belsey R; Goitein RK; Baer DM
    JAMA; 1987 Jul; 258(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 3599329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.