These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20170921)

  • 1. Trabecular bone strains around a dental implant and associated micromotions--a micro-CT-based three-dimensional finite element study.
    Limbert G; van Lierde C; Muraru OL; Walboomers XF; Frank M; Hansson S; Middleton J; Jaecques S
    J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(7):1251-61. PubMed ID: 20170921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of implant angulation on the resonance frequency of a dental implant.
    Harirforoush R; Arzanpour S; Chehroudi B
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Aug; 36(8):1024-32. PubMed ID: 24953568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical role of peri-implant cancellous bone architecture.
    Matsunaga S; Shirakura Y; Ohashi T; Nakahara K; Tamatsu Y; Takano N; Ide Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 20617221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of dental implant loading on atrophic and non-atrophic cancellous and cortical mandibular bone - a feasibility study.
    Marcián P; Borák L; Valášek J; Kaiser J; Florian Z; Wolff J
    J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3830-6. PubMed ID: 25468296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Trabecular Bone on Peri-Implant Stress and Strain Based on Micro-CT Finite Element Modeling of Beagle Dog.
    Liao SH; Zhu XH; Xie J; Sohodeb VK; Ding X
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():3926941. PubMed ID: 27403424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Influence of trabecular microstructure modeling on finite element analysis of dental implant].
    Shen MJ; Wang GG; Zhu XH; Ding X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 51(9):542-5. PubMed ID: 27596344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Micro finite element analysis of dental implants under different loading conditions.
    Marcián P; Wolff J; Horáčková L; Kaiser J; Zikmund T; Borák L
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():157-165. PubMed ID: 29587150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
    Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of surface treatment on stress distribution in immediately loaded dental implants--a 3D finite element analysis.
    Bahrami B; Shahrbaf S; Mirzakouchaki B; Ghalichi F; Ashtiani M; Martin N
    Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):e89-97. PubMed ID: 24559526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of Young's modulus of loaded implants on bone remodeling: an experimental and numerical study in the goat knee.
    Stoppie N; Van Oosterwyck H; Jansen J; Wolke J; Wevers M; Naert I
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Sep; 90(3):792-803. PubMed ID: 18615463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between the peri-implant bone structure and stress distribution around the mandibular canal: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kinoshita H; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Usami A; Yoshinari M; Takano N; Ide Y; Abe S
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(4):637-42. PubMed ID: 23903647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.
    Geng JP; Xu DW; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15453222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voxel-based micro-finite element analysis of dental implants in a human cadaveric mandible: Tissue modulus assignment and sensitivity analyses.
    Mao Q; Su K; Zhou Y; Hossaini-Zadeh M; Lewis GS; Du J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Jun; 94():229-237. PubMed ID: 30925312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.