180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20170993)
1. Correction of skeletal Class II--anterior deep bite and prominent chin by forced surgical rotation of the mandible.
Mommaerts MY; López-Arcas JM; Schurmans AM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 48(5):349-51. PubMed ID: 20170993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical options in deep-bite mandibular deficiency with prominent chin - aesthetic considerations.
Mommaerts MY; Shteif M; Hendrickx K; Laster Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 14980593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical correction of a Class II skeletal malocclusion associated with anterior open bite and temporomandibular joint pain.
Mendes Miguel JA; Cal-Neto JP; da Silveira HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):400-7. PubMed ID: 17826611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anterior mandibular apical base augmentation in the surgical orthodontic treatment of mandibular retrusion.
Brusati R; Giannì AB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 34(8):846-50. PubMed ID: 16257355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal study of combined orthodontic and surgical treatment of Class II malocclusion with deep overbite.
Jäger A; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Luhr HG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 1940537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A surgical mandibular advancement performed under local anesthesia and intravenous sedation for a severe skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Guiducci A; Raffaini M
Prog Orthod; 2006; 7(2):228-43. PubMed ID: 17143349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Indications for the inverted-L osteotomy: report of 3 cases.
Medeiros PJ; Ritto F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):435-44. PubMed ID: 19138625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving quality of life with a team approach: a case report.
Keles A; Pamukcu B; Işik F; Gemalmaz D; Güzel MZ
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 12390007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka K; Luder J; Iizuka T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non surgical treatment of a Class II malocclusion with skeletal hyperdivergency and anterior open bite.
Rodriguez Flores JM
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009; 20(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 19438108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic MRI evaluation of tongue posture and deglutitive movements in a surgically corrected open bite.
Karacay S; Akin E; Ortakoglu K; Bengi AO
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 17090175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
Kuroda S; Murakami K; Morishige Y; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction of mandibular dentoalveolar retrusion by segmental mandibular surgery.
Lorenzon C; Richter M; Mossaz C
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 7814925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors related to stability following the surgical correction of skeletal open bite.
Ito G; Koh M; Fujita T; Shirakura M; Ueda H; Tanne K
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 24968647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
Ricard D; Ferri J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The stability of bimaxillary osteotomy after correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Ayoub AF; Stirrups DR; Moos KF
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):155-70. PubMed ID: 8301164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of skeletal stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal open bite with mandibular counterclockwise rotation using modified inverted L osteotomy.
Aymach Z; Nei H; Kawamura H; Van Sickels J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):853-60. PubMed ID: 21074308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
