These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20171044)
1. Margin of error in alignment: a study undertaken when converting from conventional to computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Maniar RN; Johorey AC; Pujary CT; Yadava AN J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 20171044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. Barrett WP; Mason JB; Moskal JT; Dalury DF; Oliashirazi A; Fisher DA J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1273-1284.e1. PubMed ID: 21723703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Plain radiograph fails to reflect the alignment and advantages of navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Choi WC; Lee S; An JH; Kim D; Seong SC; Lee MC J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 20875940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accelerometer-Based and Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Reduction in Mechanical Axis Outliers Does Not Lead to Improvement in Functional Outcomes or Quality of Life When Compared to Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. Goh GS; Liow MHL; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Tan MH J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):379-385. PubMed ID: 29054725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Choong PF; Dowsey MM; Stoney JD J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):560-9. PubMed ID: 18534397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: nonimage-based navigation system versus conventional technique. Zhang XL; Zhang W; Shao JJ Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Jan; 125(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 22340552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Tolk JJ; Koot HW; Janssen RP J Knee Surg; 2012 Sep; 25(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 23150163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiographic analysis of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Nam D; Jerabek SA; Haughom B; Cross MB; Reinhardt KR; Mayman DJ J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1527-33. PubMed ID: 21397455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femur positioning in navigated total knee arthroplasty. Pfitzner T; Röhner E; Preininger B; Perka C; Matziolis G Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10 Suppl):45-9. PubMed ID: 23026252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional component alignment and functional outcome in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing two navigation systems. Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1285-90. PubMed ID: 21316913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer navigation vs extramedullary guide for sagittal alignment of tibial components: radiographic study and meta-analysis. Kuzyk PR; Higgins GA; Tunggal JA; Sellan ME; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):630-7. PubMed ID: 21917415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cutting error of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty by use of a navigation system. Nakahara H; Matsuda S; Moro-oka TA; Okazaki K; Tashiro Y; Iwamoto Y J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1119-22. PubMed ID: 22019323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: impact on clinical and radiographic outcomes. Hiscox CM; Bohm ER; Turgeon TR; Hedden DR; Burnell CD J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1259-64. PubMed ID: 21592721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of limb and component alignment using computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study of 467 knees. Mullaji A; Kanna R; Marawar S; Kohli A; Sharma A J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):953-9. PubMed ID: 17920465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting the postoperative limb alignment and clinical outcome after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Kim SJ; Bae JH; Lim HC J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1210-5. PubMed ID: 22285234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique. Jung KA; Kim SJ; Lee SC; Hwang SH; Ahn NK Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 19945880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. Lützner J; Krummenauer F; Wolf C; Günther KP; Kirschner S J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1039-44. PubMed ID: 18669959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of the Medium-Term Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer-Assisted and Conventional Techniques to Treat Patients With Extraarticular Femoral Deformities. Bae DK; Song SJ; Park CH; Ko YW; Lee H J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 27460297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of component alignment on patellar kinematics in total knee arthroplasty. Keshmiri A; Maderbacher G; Baier C; Sendtner E; Schaumburger J; Zeman F; Grifka J; Springorum HR Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 25582349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty]. Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]