These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20171046)

  • 1. Re: A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
    Olgun ZD; Atilla B
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):499; author reply 499. PubMed ID: 20171046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
    McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB; Marr JT
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):33-8. PubMed ID: 19447001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
    Sierra RJ; Berry DJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7 Suppl):20-3. PubMed ID: 18701240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can high-flexion tibial inserts improve range of motion after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?
    Crow BD; McCauley JC; Ezzet KA
    Orthopedics; 2010 Sep; 33(9):667. PubMed ID: 20839712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Harato K; Bourne RB; Victor J; Snyder M; Hart J; Ries MD
    Knee; 2008 Jun; 15(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 18325770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double-concave deformity of the polyethylene tibial post in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
    Niki Y; Matsumoto H; Yoshimine F; Toyama Y; Suda Y; Banks SA
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):497.e7-10. PubMed ID: 19261434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of 2 Tibial Inserts of Different Constraint for Cruciate-Retaining Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Additional Tool for Balancing the Posterior Cruciate Ligament.
    Emerson RH; Barrington JW; Olugbode SA; Alnachoukati OK
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Feb; 31(2):425-8. PubMed ID: 26481407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior cruciate ligament substitution is not essential for excellent postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.
    Parsley BS; Conditt MA; Bertolusso R; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):127-31. PubMed ID: 16950074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recurrent dissociation of the tibial insert after mini-subvastus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a case report.
    In Y; Sur YJ; Won HY; Moon YS
    Knee; 2011 Dec; 18(6):461-3. PubMed ID: 20833051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of sterilization method on articular surface damage of retrieved cruciate-retaining tibial inserts.
    Greulich MT; Roy ME; Whiteside LA
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1085-93. PubMed ID: 22177798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro investigation of knee joint kinematics following cruciate retaining versus cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasty.
    Siebel T; Käfer W
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2003 Oct; 69(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 14648953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Knee kinematics in genesis total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of different tibial designs with and without posterior cruciate substitution in cadaveric specimens.
    Incavo SJ; Beynnon BD; Johnson CC; Churchill DL
    Am J Knee Surg; 1997; 10(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 9421596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of range of motion after posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Stiehl JB; Voorhorst PE; Keblish P; Sorrells RB
    Am J Knee Surg; 1997; 10(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 9421597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effect of increased posterior tibial slope or partial posterior cruciate ligament release on knee kinematics of total knee arthroplasty].
    Wang XF; Chen BC; Shi CX; Gao SJ; Shao DC; Li T; Lu B; Chen JQ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 45(12):839-42. PubMed ID: 17845788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
    Nicholls RL; Schirm AC; Jeffcote BO; Kuster MS
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical to assess soft tissue tension in an anatomically correct flexed position.
    Bindelglass DF
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):655; author reply 655-6. PubMed ID: 22424311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of prospective, randomized clinical trials comparing standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized TKA: a focused review.
    Hamilton WG; Sritulanondha S; Engh CA
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e500-3. PubMed ID: 21902144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective analysis of total knee arthroplasty cases for visual, histological, and clinical eligibility of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.
    Arno S; Maffei D; Walker PS; Schwarzkopf R; Desai P; Steiner GC
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1396-403. PubMed ID: 21353454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of the posterior cruciate ligament and component design on joint line position after primary total knee arthroplasty.
    Snider MG; Macdonald SJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1093-8. PubMed ID: 19027265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Influence of the tibial slope on tibial translation and mobility of non-constrained total knee prosthesis].
    Migaud H; De Ladoucette A; Dohin B; Cloutier JM; Gougeon F; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8762983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.