163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20171416)
1. The relevance of international studies to informed pharmacoeconomics and health policy decisions.
Lyles A
Clin Ther; 2010 Jan; 32(1):106-7. PubMed ID: 20171416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Spending limited health care dollars on what works best: the promise of comparative effectiveness research.
Stein J
N C Med J; 2010; 71(3):265-6. PubMed ID: 20681501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comments on 'Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure'.
Morton SC
Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1989-90; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science and the stiumulus. Medicine under the microscope.
Marshall E
Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1183-5. PubMed ID: 19965447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effectiveness.
Aston G
Trustee; 2010 Jan; 63(1):13-4, 19-21. PubMed ID: 20143663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The promise and future of comparative effectiveness research.
Clancy CM
J Nurs Care Qual; 2010; 25(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20010250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative effectiveness research: Promising area of study for pharmacists.
Clancy CM
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2010 Mar-Apr 1; 50(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 20199952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative effectiveness. An idea whose time has finally come.
Sipkoff M
Manag Care; 2009 Apr; 18(4):14-6, 19-21. PubMed ID: 19472562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effectiveness research: what effects for nurses?
Largent E
Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2011; 30(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 21135606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. US healthcare reform: implications for health economics and outcomes research.
Chambers JD; Neumann PJ
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Jun; 10(3):215-6. PubMed ID: 20545583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness and real-world evidence.
Leonard DT
Am J Manag Care; 2010 Jun; 16(6):410-1. PubMed ID: 20560684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What works? What does it cost? Comparative studies will drive decisions in health care reform.
Assael LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20006146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute can best influence real-world health care decision making.
Garber AM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Dec; 30(12):2243-51. PubMed ID: 22147851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The historical and moral imperatives of comparative effectiveness research.
Lauer MS
Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1982-4; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of recent federal spending on comparative effectiveness research: priorities, gaps, and next steps.
Benner JS; Morrison MR; Karnes EK; Kocot SL; McClellan M
Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-76. PubMed ID: 20921474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Industry influence on comparative-effectiveness research funded through health care reform.
Selker HP; Wood AJ
N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(27):2595-7. PubMed ID: 19923560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: a response to public outcry for better use of healthcare dollars.
Eschiti VS; Zahourek R
Beginnings; 2012 Aug; 32(4):14-6. PubMed ID: 23155886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lack of support for cost-utility analysis in the health care reform law: a case of ignorance or political posturing?
Shaw JW
Clin Ther; 2010 Jun; 32(6):1091-2. PubMed ID: 20637963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.
Berger ML; Mamdani M; Atkins D; Johnson ML
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1044-52. PubMed ID: 19793072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
